September 24th 2005


  Buy Issue 2716
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Telstra sale: not a 'done deal'

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Could Australia cope with a natural disaster?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Are new anti-terror laws good for Australia?

INTELLIGENCE: Past espionage failure spooks US partnership

STRAWS IN THE WIND: New Orleans - a cracked society / Unemployment / Costello's new constituency / Liberal leadership / Potemkin politics

TAIWAN: Taiwan's tax system keeps money in the family

UNITED STATES: Judge Roberts impresses at US Senate hearing

AGRICULTURE: Unbridled globalism harms poorer nations

SPECIAL FEATURE: How the sex industry destroys society (Part 2)

THEATRE: Play's one-sided slant on Bush and the Iraq War

Who is to blame for New Orleans tragedy? (letter)

Tony Blair and the Iraq War (letter)

Family Law's five-fold disaster (letter)

OBITUARY: Frank Rooney - R.I.P.

BOOKS: UNSPEAKABLE: Facing Up To Evil in an Age of Genocide and Terror, by Os Guinness

MAKING 'BLACK HARVEST': Warfare, film-making and living dangerously in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Family Law's five-fold disaster (letter)


by Janos Paskandy

News Weekly, September 24, 2005
Sir,

Almost 30 years after the enactment of the Family Law Act 1975, Australia has suffered a five-fold disaster:

  • a divorce epidemic;

  • a half stolen generation;

  • fathers dispossessed of their property, children and a large part of their income on an ongoing basis;

  • a lower level of achievement but increased drug abuse and higher crime rate among children, attributed to their growing up practically fatherless; and

  • dispossessed fathers' suicides exceeding the road toll.

In search of a solution, the Government established a House of Representatives standing committee on family and community affairs.

Public submissions were called for on the issue, "in particular, whether there should be a presumption that children will spend equal time with each parent and, if so, in what circumstances such a presumption could be rebutted".

Even the blind could see that enacting such a presumption would bring to an end the five-fold disaster.

The winners would be children and fathers, and ultimately society as a whole, at the expense of a divorce industry and those mothers who disregard the most important need of their children and hence harm society.

In spite of the overwhelming majority of inquiry submissions which supported the presumption, the committee report recommended against it.

A draft Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005, if made law, would see the establishment of 65 family relationship centres, at a cost of $397.2 million over four years.

The Government would make these centres a compulsory entry point for the resolution of problems arising from separation, somehow trusting that those women - knowing what they can get out of the family courts and being hell-bent on not allowing a relationship between their children and their fathers, and reaping the financial benefits of their arrangements - would all of a sudden voluntarily short-change themselves.

Janos Paskandy,
Mirrabooka, WA




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

CLIMATE SCIENCE Temperature hasn't risen in 20 years: latest data

COVER STORY Shocking truth behind soaring power prices

ABORTION Law condones the act as it criminalises the image

COVER STORY The populist wedge: political disaffection comes to Australia

EDITORIAL Human Rights Commission needs to start afresh post Professor Triggs

VICTORIA Doctors in Secondary Schools program sidelines parents

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 'Equality' a false promise to end 'discrimination'



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am