September 24th 2005


  Buy Issue 2716
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Telstra sale: not a 'done deal'

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Could Australia cope with a natural disaster?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Are new anti-terror laws good for Australia?

INTELLIGENCE: Past espionage failure spooks US partnership

STRAWS IN THE WIND: New Orleans - a cracked society / Unemployment / Costello's new constituency / Liberal leadership / Potemkin politics

TAIWAN: Taiwan's tax system keeps money in the family

UNITED STATES: Judge Roberts impresses at US Senate hearing

AGRICULTURE: Unbridled globalism harms poorer nations

SPECIAL FEATURE: How the sex industry destroys society (Part 2)

THEATRE: Play's one-sided slant on Bush and the Iraq War

Who is to blame for New Orleans tragedy? (letter)

Tony Blair and the Iraq War (letter)

Family Law's five-fold disaster (letter)

OBITUARY: Frank Rooney - R.I.P.

BOOKS: UNSPEAKABLE: Facing Up To Evil in an Age of Genocide and Terror, by Os Guinness

MAKING 'BLACK HARVEST': Warfare, film-making and living dangerously in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CANBERRA OBSERVED:
Are new anti-terror laws good for Australia?




News Weekly, September 24, 2005
Australian security agencies fear that Australia is overdue for a terrorist attack.

Australia has so far been fortunate in having escaped a mainland terrorist strike in the four years since the official starting date of the war against terror, September 11, 2001.

There have been sporadic political dust-ups about whether Australia has become more of a terror target as a result of its decision to join the "Coalition of the Willing'' war in Iraq.

But no politician or security agency has dared to make any particular boasts or try to gain political capital out of Australia's success in staving off a local attack.

This is partly because we have already had our own attacks on Australia, albeit offshore - one in Bali orchestrated by Al-Qaeda offshoot, Jemaah Islamiah, which killed 88 Australians, and another outside the Australian embassy in Jakarta.

Attack overdue

But the main reason for the reticence is that authorities are more or less certain that an onshore attack is overdue.

Whether this event occurs next month or in five years' time, only then will the political blame game occur about whether the Australian Government had done enough to protect its citizens and infrastructure from an attack.

At least 100 Australian citizens are known to have trained in Al-Qaeda camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Many others have travelled overseas to study with radical Islamic organisations.

Thousands more young Australians have been indoctrinated by radical clerics or simply by reading material over the internet.

The extent of their networks and associations cannot be known.

Furthermore, Australian security organisations, like their American and British counterparts, were caught out badly by September 11 and have been desperately working to catch up on their severe deficiencies in languages and in understanding and penetrating the Islamic world.

The problem for the Government is that no amount of money or laws or police powers can actually prevent members of these groups perpetrating a terrorist attack.

Ultimately, the decision becomes a political one: To what extent does the Government allocate funding toward the fight against terror? How restrictive should its laws be? And what sacrifices to their personal liberty should citizens be required to make to guarantee their safety?

Prime Minister John Howard has just announced a new raft of measures to help agencies such as ASIO do their work, but has run straight into heavy opposition from human rights and civil libertarian groups.

At the same time, Mr Howard has been running a parallel public relations operation in which he has been seen to be "reaching out'' to Muslim groups, particularly the moderate clerics, and enlisting them in the fight against the Islamic radicals.

Under the proposed new laws, terror suspects could be locked away without charge for up to two weeks and, controversially, suspects would also be forced to wear electronic tracking devices for up to 12 months.

The most contentious measure will be a new régime of preventative detention - holding terror suspects without arrest or charge for up to a fortnight.

The laws are similar to those already introduced in the United Kingdom, and would be brought into force during terror alerts or following an attack.

Suspects would be held to stop further attacks or the destruction of evidence.

It would also be a new crime to leave luggage unattended anywhere near an airport.

Opposition Leader Kim Beazley has described the measures as a "half-developed plan'', but is unlikely to oppose them.

One of the major concerns about the new laws is that there is no time limit on them - unlike other wars, there is potentially no way of ever telling when the war on terror is over.

After some sustained criticism Mr Howard has hinted that he may be prepared to introduce a sunset clause on the legislation. There is also no way of gauging the effectiveness of the new laws by any independent body to check whether there is any abuse.

Restrictions

The other concern is that the legislation constitutes the first restriction on human movement using technological devices by an Australian Government.

It was not without irony that, on the same day Mr Howard announced his proposed new anti-terror laws, Victorian Premier Steve Bracks announced the compulsory micro-chipping of every cat and dog in the state.

The public are likely to accept the latest restrictions on freedom, but the alarm bells must be beginning to sound.

And the worry is that, following a feared terrorist attack, there will be even more new and tougher laws and restrictions, without our ever knowing whether previous laws were effective or not.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm