July 30th 2005


  Buy Issue 2712
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: In the name of Allah, the wise and the merciful

EDITORIAL: Islamist terrorism: what it signifies

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Dangers of a national ID card

BIOETHICS: Review of human cloning and embryo experimentation

DRUGS CONFERENCE: Tougher approach on drugs urged

WOMEN'S HEALTH: Conspiracy of silence about breast cancer

WORKPLACE RELATIONS: New workplace reforms: the devil is in the detail

SUGAR INDUSTRY: Ethanol coming: but nothing for farmers

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: How to help countries to prosper

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Immigration - who cleans up? / Copping payback / To be or not to be? / Terrorism as ideology

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: The Judeo-Christian legacy

CONSERVATION: Conservation vs. environmentalism

A national ID card? (letter)

Chirac's untimely taunts (letter)

Max wrong on tax (letter)

Revenue-raising stunt (letter)

BOOKS: CIVIL PASSIONS: Selected Writings, by Martin Krygier

BOOKS: BOY SOLDIERS OF THE GREAT WAR: Their own stories for the first time, by Richard van Emden

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

BOOKS:
BOY SOLDIERS OF THE GREAT WAR: Their own stories for the first time, by Richard van Emden


by Michael Daniel (reviewer)

News Weekly, July 30, 2005
Youths to the slaughter

BOY SOLDIERS OF THE GREAT WAR: Their own stories for the first time
by Richard van Emden

London: Headline
Hardcover RRP: $59.95

Attend any veterans' gathering and read and listen to war stories and it will not take long before you hear of someone who lied about his age to enlist.

First World War accounts, in particular, are replete with stories of those who fought well below the minimum age, in some instances as young as 14 or 15.

While individual accounts of such soldiers have appeared in print from time to time, Richard van Emden's Boy Soldiers of the Great War appears to be the first comprehensive study of this phenomenon.

Although the focus of this study is on the British Army, van Emden makes passing reference to under-age enlistments in the Dominion forces, for example, the Australian, Canadian and South African armies.

Despite the fact that the minimum age for front line service was 19, a large number of boys were able to enlist successfully in the British Army during the Great War, particularly in the period before the introduction of conscription in 1916.

Patriotic fervour

Given the horrors of trench warfare and high casualties, how was this possible? Caught up in a patriotic fervour at the outbreak and in the early stages of the war, many boys - like their older counterparts - rushed to enlist.

As presentation of a birth certificate was not required, many youths lied about their age, in some cases with the connivance of recruiting sergeants who were paid a bounty per recruit.

For example, if a doctor was uncertain about their age, a sergeant would tell the boys to return after taking a walk around the block, by which time they would have grown up by a couple of years.

Encouragement also came in the form of newspaper clippings extolling the heroic actions of under-age soldiers, and also from members of local communities who actively encouraged and/or pressured those under-age to enlist.

In some cases, boys enlisted with parental support; in others, they gave false names.

This practice persisted despite mounting pressure to prevent it.

Although awkward and direct questions were asked in parliament, the then most practicable solution - namely, the compulsory presentation of a birth certificate upon enlistment - was never adopted.

Parents could request their sons be withdrawn from the front, but this solution was often only possible with the co-operation of their sons, and only after encountering extensive red tape.

Wholesale under-age enlistment largely disappeared with the introduction of conscription; and a policy was adopted whereby those already in the army who were under-age were withdrawn from front-line service and sent to French military bases, such as Etaples, where they undertook further training or other duties until they reached 19.

However, given the desperate need of troops in the wake of the March 1918 German offensive, those aged 18 were included in drafts to the front.

Boy soldiers suffered fates similar to their older companions in the front-line. Some, unable to cope with the stresses of battle, were successful in getting themselves discharged or removed from the front, by declaring their real age.

Many were killed in action or died of wounds, often under aliases, so that their families never discovered their fate, while others were promoted or commissioned and/or won medals for bravery.

Boy Soldiers of the Great War is an interesting account, based in part upon the oral histories of boy-soldiers themselves and collected by the author in recent years.

Richard van Emden's study brings to light one of the more disturbing aspects of the Great War.

Numbers and percentages

Dealing with the material chronologically, van Emden concludes by trying to determine numbers and percentages.

While it is difficult to arrive at an exact figure, given the deliberate falsification of ages - and, in some cases, names - upon enlistment, extensive studies suggest that in certain units, as many as 12 per cent of soldiers were under-age.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Much food for reflection in a single Christmas carol

FOREIGN AFFAIRS The left's whitewash of Fidel Castro

THE MEDIA Greed, ideology generate burst of fake news online

WA LEGISLATION Foetal homicide reform a very small step forward

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition limps through year of frustrations

BOOK APPRAISAL Religious incredulity: a most modern virtue

AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENT The financial and social costs of cramming ourselves into just five coastal cities



News and views from around the world



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm