January 29th 2005

  Buy Issue 2699

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Lessons of the tsunami tragedy

TAX REFORM: Time to abolish income tax?

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Labor needs new direction as well as new leader

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor after the Latham experiment

WA ELECTIONS: Labor's Geoff Gallop looking at defeat

FREEDOM OF SPEECH: The perils of vilification laws

EDUCATION: Deconstructing 'Critical Literacy'

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Ockham's Razor ... or Jack the Ripper? / Hogarth's Melbourne / Victoria's ailing hospitals

RUSSIA: Putin, Communism, and Santamaria's hopes for Russia

INDONESIA: Jemaah Islamiah's threat to regional security

Swifter response needed (letter)

Labor misrepresented (letter)

WW2 Allied air raids (letter)

CINEMA: Behind the Kinsey legend

BOOKS: BIOEVOLUTION: How Biotechnology is Changing the World, by Michael Fumento

BOOKS: EICHMANN: His Life and Crimes, by David Cesarani

Books promotion page

Labor misrepresented (letter)

by Daniel Krips

News Weekly, January 29, 2005

Your editorial analysis of the issue of independent (religious) schools funding warrants correction (Canberra Observed, News Weekly, December 18).

The article states that the policy course embraced by Labor during the last year's federal election campaign "would have whittled away state aid to independent, mainly religious, schools."

This represents an appalling misrepresentation of both the intent and effect of the policy. Thousands of struggling Catholic and other independent schools would have been the great beneficiaries.

Labor's policy was to boost funding to the public education system, while maintaining funding to the private system, but redistributing where that maintained level of funding actually went.

Total Commonwealth funding of independent schools under Labor's policy would have remained at the same level. The redistributive effect involved taking millions away from a select few schools at the very top (i.e., those with rifle ranges and heated pools) in favour of independent schools struggling to afford stationery and chalk.

Indeed, the whole point of Labor's schools policy was to guarantee all Australian school students a significant minimum resource backing: one that would ensure proper education regardless of the nature of the institution attended. I am at a loss as to how this could be construed as in some way sectarian or class-oriented.

Actually reading Labor's policy documents, rather than Coalition press releases, would have been of strong assistance to anybody preparing such editorial analysis.

Daniel Krips,
Joslin, SA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs

News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am