January 29th 2005

  Buy Issue 2699

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Lessons of the tsunami tragedy

TAX REFORM: Time to abolish income tax?

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Labor needs new direction as well as new leader

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor after the Latham experiment

WA ELECTIONS: Labor's Geoff Gallop looking at defeat

FREEDOM OF SPEECH: The perils of vilification laws

EDUCATION: Deconstructing 'Critical Literacy'

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Ockham's Razor ... or Jack the Ripper? / Hogarth's Melbourne / Victoria's ailing hospitals

RUSSIA: Putin, Communism, and Santamaria's hopes for Russia

INDONESIA: Jemaah Islamiah's threat to regional security

Swifter response needed (letter)

Labor misrepresented (letter)

WW2 Allied air raids (letter)

CINEMA: Behind the Kinsey legend

BOOKS: BIOEVOLUTION: How Biotechnology is Changing the World, by Michael Fumento

BOOKS: EICHMANN: His Life and Crimes, by David Cesarani

Books promotion page

Labor misrepresented (letter)

by Daniel Krips

News Weekly, January 29, 2005

Your editorial analysis of the issue of independent (religious) schools funding warrants correction (Canberra Observed, News Weekly, December 18).

The article states that the policy course embraced by Labor during the last year's federal election campaign "would have whittled away state aid to independent, mainly religious, schools."

This represents an appalling misrepresentation of both the intent and effect of the policy. Thousands of struggling Catholic and other independent schools would have been the great beneficiaries.

Labor's policy was to boost funding to the public education system, while maintaining funding to the private system, but redistributing where that maintained level of funding actually went.

Total Commonwealth funding of independent schools under Labor's policy would have remained at the same level. The redistributive effect involved taking millions away from a select few schools at the very top (i.e., those with rifle ranges and heated pools) in favour of independent schools struggling to afford stationery and chalk.

Indeed, the whole point of Labor's schools policy was to guarantee all Australian school students a significant minimum resource backing: one that would ensure proper education regardless of the nature of the institution attended. I am at a loss as to how this could be construed as in some way sectarian or class-oriented.

Actually reading Labor's policy documents, rather than Coalition press releases, would have been of strong assistance to anybody preparing such editorial analysis.

Daniel Krips,
Joslin, SA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am