January 29th 2005


  Buy Issue 2699
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Lessons of the tsunami tragedy

TAX REFORM: Time to abolish income tax?

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Labor needs new direction as well as new leader

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor after the Latham experiment

WA ELECTIONS: Labor's Geoff Gallop looking at defeat

FREEDOM OF SPEECH: The perils of vilification laws

EDUCATION: Deconstructing 'Critical Literacy'

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Ockham's Razor ... or Jack the Ripper? / Hogarth's Melbourne / Victoria's ailing hospitals

RUSSIA: Putin, Communism, and Santamaria's hopes for Russia

INDONESIA: Jemaah Islamiah's threat to regional security

Swifter response needed (letter)

Labor misrepresented (letter)

WW2 Allied air raids (letter)

CINEMA: Behind the Kinsey legend

BOOKS: BIOEVOLUTION: How Biotechnology is Changing the World, by Michael Fumento

BOOKS: EICHMANN: His Life and Crimes, by David Cesarani

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Swifter response needed (letter)


by Tom King

News Weekly, January 29, 2005
Sir,

Just how many natural and man-contributed disasters will we as Australians confront before we demand a proactive rather than reactive national response?

The present begging-bowl approach is not desirable for many reasons, primarily because time is of the essence and reaction delays equate to lives forfeited.

When cash is harvested from a generous population, the benefits are discounted by virtue of administrative deductions of questionable justification.

Purchases are made in distant obscure markets, and theft and misdirection are a matter of record.

We must demand of our Government the establishment of an Australian Provident program.

This will ensure that Australian manufacturers are commissioned to deliver the required stocks of food product, clothing, shelter, utensils, preventative medicines, powdered milk and infant food, etc, that will be ready for dispatch immediately a local or international need is confirmed.

The military has the procedural capacity to manage such a plan.

Perishable products approaching the end of their shelf life can be donated to our own needy, or else consigned to Third World destinations where charitable enterprises have a presence on the ground.

Such a scheme could be funded by an annual levy of $5 or $10 on taxpayers or benefit-recipients.

Tom King,
Elanora, Qld




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am