December 4th 1999


  Buy Issue
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

BOOKS: A RETURN TO MODESTY: Discovering the Lost Virtue, by Wendy Shalit

BOOKS: 'Constanze, Mozart's Beloved', by Agnes Selby

EDITORIAL - Microsoft and the dangers of private monopolies

CANBERRA OBSERVED

Fall of the Wall

Contents - 04 December, 1999

ECONOMICS - Can co-operatives civilise capitalism?

WORLD FAMILY CONGRESS

ECONOMICS - More than self-interest needed for a functioning economy

England's countryside: reformed to oblivion

HISTORY - Poland's WWWII agony

TAIWAN - Taiwan's quake recovery shows remarkable resilience

NATIONAL AFFAIRS - Senate inquiry questions dairy deregulation

AS THE WORLD TURNS

ECONOMICS - Competition, profit and common sense

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CANBERRA OBSERVED


by News Weekly

News Weekly, December 4, 1999
Boat people, population policy and the ALP

The recent panic about armadas of illegal immigrants descending on Australia over the coming months has disguised what is likely to be one of the 'sleeper' issues in the lead-up to the next federal election.

For the first time in many years the major political parties now have markedly divergent views on immigration, decentralisation, fertility rates, and where they see Australia's population heading over the coming decades.

Federal Immigration Minister, Philip Ruddock, probably against his private instincts, has categorically rejected calls for a formal government population policy.

It is a debate the Coalition is reluctant to start for fear of the electoral fall-out it might provoke, and where it eventually might lead.

Mr Ruddock currently has plenty on his plate grappling with the serious problem of waves of boats of illegal immigrants coming from China and the Middle East.

The illegal immigrants are highly organised, with connections with organised crime in Australia. They are enormously costly to catch, care for and send back to their home countries.

Mr Ruddock is also confined by elements of the Liberal and National Parties which are ever wary of the persistence of the One Nation factor, particularly in regard to immigration and population levels.

Largely in response to the apparent popularity of One Nation's anti-immigration stance, the Howard Government has tightened up the immigration numbers severely, particularly in the family reunion category.

It may well be true that the winding back of immigration numbers is the correct policy response in times of high unemployment.

However, this is still no excuse for accepting a policy drift on the vital question of what level of population Australia needs for the next 50 years, and whether that population will be home grown or imported.

On September 17 Opposition Leader Kim Beazley delivered a little-publicised landmark speech in Adelaide where he outlined Labor's intention of accelerating Australia's population growth rate.

Mr Beazley argued that a higher population was economically beneficial, vital to national security, and would improve Australia's ties with the rest of the world.

Most importantly, Mr Beazley said a larger working age population would help future governments afford the extra costs which will come as a result of an ageing population.

Mr Beazley wants a mix of higher immigration numbers and a higher fertility rate in response to Australia's falling birth rate, which is already well under replacement level.

'The average age of migrants might be less than the average age of the current Australian population, but the average age of newborn kids (last time I checked) is zero,' he said.

'Yet Australia's birth rate is now at an historic low and is projected to fall further in the near future. Without some measures to improve our national birth rate, it is projected to fall from 1.78 in 1997 to 1.65 in 2006.

'Policies which improve Australia's birth rate will not only address the ageing of our population in the future, they are important contributions to a better society right now.'


'Family friendly'
Mr Beazley's views have been recently fleshed out by Labor's shadow spokesman on population, Martin Ferguson, who says that if elected his party would establish an Office of Population. Labor will market its higher population policies as being 'family friendly', giving men and women maximum options in being able to raise children and work.

It was significant that Mr Beazley chose Adelaide to deliver his speech.

South Australia and Tasmania are two states suffering an exodus of people, particularly young people, and those with skills and talents seeking jobs and higher wages in the larger cities.

Pushing for more migrants to come to Australia is not a vote winner, although it is strangely ironic that some of the strongest anti-immigration views come from the same areas which are most in need of higher populations.

In fact, Labor has chosen a bold, controversial and certainly in some quarters, unpopular path, which is fraught with political dangers.

Many environmentalists and a significant proportion of the left of the Labor Party itself believe Australia's population is already much too large, and Labor is certain to suffer some flak from these quarters.

But the real danger for Mr Beazley lies in actually implementing his strategy of changing the population mix.


Fertility rate
Lifting the fertility rate is a monumental task. Not only will it require a rethink on economics and tax; welfare, childcare, and industrial relations policies will also need to be changed.

Large families also go against decades of changing social attitudes to having children and entrenched feminist ideologies about the identity of women, parental roles and the 'anachronism' of the traditional family.

Labor's posturing about encouraging city people and migrants to live in the regions has also only ever been attempted by governments in a half-hearted way with resulting failure.

Nevertheless, Labor is at least attempting to open up the debate on this vital issue which is the ticking time bomb for Australian governments of all political persuasions.

At the moment there is one Australian of retirement age for every five Australians of working age. At current levels of migration, by the year 2021 there will be one for about every 3.5.

By the year 2051, the ratio will be one retired Australian for every 2.5 working Australians, a demographic which would make it impossible for governments - and more particularly the burdened taxpayer - to fund pensions, aged care, and hospitals.
Unless there is a drastic rethink on Australia's population future, something will clearly have to give.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm