February 26th 2005


  Buy Issue 2701
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: NATIONAL AFFAIRS: The WMC takeover - losing our last mining giant

EDITORIAL: A challenge to the biotech corporations?

SCHOOLS: The battle for our children's minds

SPECIAL FEATURE: 1.5 million dead Armenians (but don't tell the EU)

ECONOMICS: Australia's plight in dire need of a remedy

SUGAR INDUSTRY: Anger at stalled sugar package

ENERGY: Ethanol needed for new fuel, engine standards

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Conspiracy against public health / Half a loaf is better than one / Palm oil - a New Class aphrodisiac

IRAQ: Shi'ite win in Iraq elections vindicates US role

CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS: China's anti-secession law raises tension

CHINA: Beijing's ban on sex-selective abortion

POPULATION: Why Australia must decentralise to new states now

OPINION: The tsunami of bias

The Holocaust Industry (letter)

Communist killings (letter)

Putin a second Stolypin? (letter)

The Left and the Iraq War (letter)

Misinformation about WW2 bombing (letter)

No reaction to Dutch infanticide (letter)

Link queried (letter)

Sure-fire recipe for disaster (letter)

BOOKS: DAWKINS' GOD: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life, by Alister McGrath

BOOKS: GOD UNDER HOWARD: The Rise of the Religious Right in Australian Politics

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS:
China's anti-secession law raises tension


by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, February 26, 2005
Plans by the Chinese Government to enact an anti-secession law, aimed at Taiwan, have lifted tensions across the Taiwan Strait.

Under the terms of the draft bill, China reaffirms that Taiwan, which has been independent of China for the past 55 years, is an integral part of China, and has the right to put on trial any person who is deemed to be involved in secessionist activities.

Taiwanese politicians and even businessmen visiting China would be the first targets of the law; but it could even extend to people from Australia expressing such sentiments, either before going to China, or inside China.

Two of Taiwan's strongest allies, Japan and the United States, have privately expressed concern about the proposed law; but are involved in private discussions with Beijing to try to have it withdrawn or watered down.

US response

Taiwanese legislators, visiting Washington in January, spoke to US State Department officials about the proposed law. They were advised that the US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, and Deputy National Security Adviser, Stephen Hadley, had conveyed US concerns about the law during a meeting with the director of China's Taiwan affairs office, Chen Yunlin, who had visited Washington earlier in January.

The US officials said Mr Chen did not bring a copy of the proposed law to his meeting; and the State Department thought this was to "test the water" about the proposed law, and that Beijing might revise it, depending on the reaction to it.

Because of on-going talks, the US State Department would not publicly express its position on the proposed law.

However, Taiwan has reacted with alarm at the proposed law. Taiwan's Institute for National Policy Research has published a paper which said, "China's decision to introduce its anti-secession draft bill demonstrates the failure of its Taiwan policy. For, if the Taiwan policy had been considered successful, China would have no reason to start contemplating laws on anti-secession or unification."

Despite periodic threats by Beijing against Taiwan, millions of Taiwanese visit the mainland every year, and capital from Taiwan has been the main engine of China's tremendous economic growth.

More than 2,000 investment projects by Taiwan businesses for mainland China worth nearly US$7 billion were approved in 2004 by the Investment Commission under the Ministry of Economic Affairs. In terms of value, the figure represented an increase of 51 per cent over the previous year.

Taiwan companies are believed to have invested between US$50 billion and US$100 billion in mainland China since 1987.

Taiwanese investment in China is welcomed by the Beijing regime.

The English-language on-line edition of the People's Daily headlined a recent story on Taiwanese investment with the words, "Chinese mainland to greet another high tide of Taiwan investment" (February 2, 2005).

Earlier, China's Vice-Minister of Commerce, Ma Xiuhong, said that China had not altered its policies encouraging Taiwan business people to invest in the mainland, and said that their legal interests would be protected by law.

However, the advent of the anti-separation law has cast a shadow over both commercial and political ties.

China's threatening behaviour towards Taiwan comes at a time when there had been signs of a thaw in cross-strait relations. After years of negotiations, China agreed to permit direct flights from Taiwan to the mainland for the Chinese New Year; and two senior Chinese officials visited Taiwan for the funeral of Taiwan's top negotiator with China, Koo Chen-fu.

This is the first time, since President Chen Shui-bian in 2000 became the first democratically-elected President of Taiwan, that senior Chinese officials have visited Taiwan in an official capacity.

In the meantime, Japan, an ally of Taiwan, has indicated its territorial intentions over islands off Taiwan by taking ownership of a lighthouse on the Tiaoyutai islands, which are claimed by Taiwan. (Taiwan was occupied by Japan between 1895 and 1945, and was only part of the mainland for four years, from 1945 to 1949.)

Since the elections in 2000, which saw President Chen Shui-bian of the Democratic People's Party defeat the candidate of the Kuomintang (KMT), Taiwan has been a free-wheeling democracy, with a vigorous free press, which has conducted both parliamentary and presidential elections.

These developments have consolidated Taiwan's relations with its principal allies, the United States and Japan. In the event of any conflict, there can be no doubt as to which side they would support.

Australia, as an ally of both the United States and Japan, would inevitably be drawn in, and should therefore encourage China to back away from its planned anti-secession law.

In the end, China's aggressive policy towards Taiwan, causing continual tensions across the Taiwan Strait, is potentially damaging to China itself.

  • Peter Westmore




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm