February 26th 2005

  Buy Issue 2701

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: NATIONAL AFFAIRS: The WMC takeover - losing our last mining giant

EDITORIAL: A challenge to the biotech corporations?

SCHOOLS: The battle for our children's minds

SPECIAL FEATURE: 1.5 million dead Armenians (but don't tell the EU)

ECONOMICS: Australia's plight in dire need of a remedy

SUGAR INDUSTRY: Anger at stalled sugar package

ENERGY: Ethanol needed for new fuel, engine standards

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Conspiracy against public health / Half a loaf is better than one / Palm oil - a New Class aphrodisiac

IRAQ: Shi'ite win in Iraq elections vindicates US role

CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS: China's anti-secession law raises tension

CHINA: Beijing's ban on sex-selective abortion

POPULATION: Why Australia must decentralise to new states now

OPINION: The tsunami of bias

The Holocaust Industry (letter)

Communist killings (letter)

Putin a second Stolypin? (letter)

The Left and the Iraq War (letter)

Misinformation about WW2 bombing (letter)

No reaction to Dutch infanticide (letter)

Link queried (letter)

Sure-fire recipe for disaster (letter)

BOOKS: DAWKINS' GOD: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life, by Alister McGrath

BOOKS: GOD UNDER HOWARD: The Rise of the Religious Right in Australian Politics

Books promotion page

Beijing's ban on sex-selective abortion

by Joseph A. D'Agostino

News Weekly, February 26, 2005
Communist China announced plans last month to criminalise sex-selective abortion, yet American and international feminist groups - quick to denounce restrictions on the "right to choose" in any country - did not complain.

Their silence is an extension of the silence they observe on China's official one-child policy, which since 1979 has forced women who have more than one child (or two children in many rural areas) to undergo sterilisation or forced abortion.

Feminists' implicit acceptance, and in some cases endorsement, of China's decision fully accords with the fundamentally statist, authoritarian world view of mainstream leftists.

They favour government regulation of almost everything, including abortion when it suits purposes they endorse such as population control. Their long-standing support for China's systematically coercive population control program is proof that reproductive freedom is not their chief concern.

Social experiments

China's infringement of choice is a classic example of how novel social experiments always create crises in which the government must intervene to solve. Socialism begets more socialism, a system of social organisation that does not work - and neither will the ban on sex-selective abortion.

Anyone, however libertarian, who believes in the sanctity of every individual human life wants governments to ban abortion in order to protect unborn children. But China has not undertaken this measure out of concern for the girls who are being disproportionately killed in the womb.

China's Communist rulers wish not to fulfill their essential government function of protecting innocent life, but, based on an authoritarian mindset, to continue to manipulate the Chinese population.

China is missing girls - 40 to 60 million of them - which will leave an equal number of young Chinese men without wives. Chinese couples, allowed to have only one or two children, abort girls in the womb in order to try for boys later.

Boys are preferred for traditional cultural reasons, because they support their parents in their old age (girls become part of their husbands' families when they marry), because they extend the family line, and because in rural areas, they can perform more labour.

Between 117 and 119 boys are now born in China for every 100 girls when naturally speaking, 105 boys should be born for every 100 girls. (Mother Nature prefers boys by 5 per cent). The Chinese government has announced plans to eliminate the new disparity between male and female births by 2010, just five years away.

The criminal sex-selective abortion ban seems unlikely to work. India criminalised it to no effect: her sex imbalance at birth has not improved.

Almost no one gets into legal trouble for sex-selective abortion. How could they? Ultrasounds are taken to monitor the health of unborn children, so doctors always know their sex. Parents find out from them, even though it's illegal for the doctors to reveal it. Then they exercise their "right to choose."

Is a preference for one sex over the other any worse a reason to have an abortion than convenience, or temporary physical or psychological discomfort? After all, 98 per cent of abortions in America are elective by even pro-choice medical standards.

China is also offering parents of one or two girls subsidies in order to encourage more of them. So the government will tax some people in order to pay other people to do what government policy has led them not to do.

It's no wonder that Zhang Yichi, the child whose birth last month officially raised China's population to 1.3 billion, was a boy.

Birthrates are dropping all over the world with or without coercion, and few countries have serious sex imbalances. Fashionably quasi-Marxist observers like to blame patriarchal attitudes for the imbalances in China and India, but almost all Third World countries have such attitudes together with populations that are more than half female. China and India have populations that are 48.4 per cent female, even though women's lives average longer than men's there as well as elsewhere.

If China's government wants to save its country from a dearth of women, it should abolish its always-evil and now-archaic population control program.

  • Joseph A. D'Agostino is vice-president for communications at the Population Research Institute.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am