August 13th 2005


  Buy Issue 2713
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: BRAZIL: The slippery road to communist dictatorship

EDITORIAL: Australia's clean, green image at risk

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Howard Government's industrial relations pain

SCHOOLS: Subverting the English curriculum

NATIONAL SECURITY: Re-thinking Australia's response to terrorism

ECONOMICS: Ethanol and the national interest

CONSTITUTION: What is wrong with a Bill of Rights?

FAMILY LAW: Paternity fraud penalises the innocent

UNITED STATES: John G. Roberts and the US Supreme Court

STRAWS IN THE WIND: How to lose with a royal flush / Hard cases / Another 'bottom of the harbour' scheme? / Waste disposal

CINEMA: 'Vigilante justice' and movie culture

FORTHCOMING TOUR: The 'Mother Teresa of Africa' to tour Australia

Better way to help African poor (letter)

Clinical judgement on treatment of dying (letter)

Serious omission (letter)

BOOKS: CULTURAL POLITICS AND ASIAN VALUES: The tepid war, by Michael D. Barr

BOOKS: NED KELLY'S LAST DAYS: Setting the record straight on the death of an outlaw

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

Serious omission (letter)


by Neale Banks

News Weekly, August 13, 2005
Sir,

In her article "Conspiracy of silence about breast cancer", Babette Francis (News Weekly, July 30, 2005) makes two compelling points:

1) that there is a conspiracy of silence about how reproductive factors affect breast-cancer risk.

2) that there is a statistical link between abortion and breast cancer.

Each of these points is cause for concern.

However, the relative importance of factors surrounding a prospective abortion has been left unaddressed.

In particular, the article can be read as presenting a prospective abortion as being, at least in significant part, a health issue for the mother - and failing to mention the life issue for the child.

From the perspective of one who upholds the absolute sanctity of human life (a point on which I have no doubt that Babette and I concur), this is incorrect. A prospective abortion is, first and foremost, a life issue for the child. This must always be seen, and presented, as the primary consideration.

I was disappointed that the important points presented in the article were overshadowed by this omission.

Neale Banks,
Mt. Waverley, Vic.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm