August 13th 2005


  Buy Issue 2713
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: BRAZIL: The slippery road to communist dictatorship

EDITORIAL: Australia's clean, green image at risk

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Howard Government's industrial relations pain

SCHOOLS: Subverting the English curriculum

NATIONAL SECURITY: Re-thinking Australia's response to terrorism

ECONOMICS: Ethanol and the national interest

CONSTITUTION: What is wrong with a Bill of Rights?

FAMILY LAW: Paternity fraud penalises the innocent

UNITED STATES: John G. Roberts and the US Supreme Court

STRAWS IN THE WIND: How to lose with a royal flush / Hard cases / Another 'bottom of the harbour' scheme? / Waste disposal

CINEMA: 'Vigilante justice' and movie culture

FORTHCOMING TOUR: The 'Mother Teresa of Africa' to tour Australia

Better way to help African poor (letter)

Clinical judgement on treatment of dying (letter)

Serious omission (letter)

BOOKS: CULTURAL POLITICS AND ASIAN VALUES: The tepid war, by Michael D. Barr

BOOKS: NED KELLY'S LAST DAYS: Setting the record straight on the death of an outlaw

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Serious omission (letter)


by Neale Banks

News Weekly, August 13, 2005
Sir,

In her article "Conspiracy of silence about breast cancer", Babette Francis (News Weekly, July 30, 2005) makes two compelling points:

1) that there is a conspiracy of silence about how reproductive factors affect breast-cancer risk.

2) that there is a statistical link between abortion and breast cancer.

Each of these points is cause for concern.

However, the relative importance of factors surrounding a prospective abortion has been left unaddressed.

In particular, the article can be read as presenting a prospective abortion as being, at least in significant part, a health issue for the mother - and failing to mention the life issue for the child.

From the perspective of one who upholds the absolute sanctity of human life (a point on which I have no doubt that Babette and I concur), this is incorrect. A prospective abortion is, first and foremost, a life issue for the child. This must always be seen, and presented, as the primary consideration.

I was disappointed that the important points presented in the article were overshadowed by this omission.

Neale Banks,
Mt. Waverley, Vic.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am