September 11th 2004


  Buy Issue 2690
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Battle lines drawn for October 9 Federal poll

EDITORIAL: Issues for the Federal Election

FAMILY: Better deal demanded for families

NOT SO DRY CONTINENT: Australia has water options

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Taiwan faces continuing threats from Beijing

POPULATION: Falling birth-rates stir action in Taiwan, Singapore

INDIA: The economic test for India's new government

PEACE-KEEPING: Sudan and the progressive mind

OPINION: The case for new states in Australia

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Howard versus New Class Labor / Tap Tap. Who's there?

CINEMA: Bus 174 - A jolting, two-hour masterpiece

CLIMATE: Global warming - the sceptics have won

DEMOCRACY: Lay your hammer down

Labor's foot-soldiers (letter)

Mondragon: a rejoinder (letter)

The West and Islam (letter)

BOOKS: The Last Valley: Dien Bien Phu and the French defeat in Vietnam

BOOKS: 7 Myths of Working Mothers, by Suzanne Venker

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

OPINION:
The case for new states in Australia


by Don Ford

News Weekly, September 11, 2004
There has never been a time in Australia's history when there was a greater need to decentralise our population, economy and government.

From the beginning of the atomic age at the end of World War II, and especially now in the age of terrorism at the beginning of the 21st century, concerned Australians realise the pressing need simultaneously to ease the pressure of population on the already overcrowded and polluted coastal cities, and to encourage people to settle in rural towns and regions, to build up these sparsely populated and economically stagnant localities into thriving, prosperous communities.

Densely populated cities

From 1945, and through the period of the Cold War, we have lived under the threat of nuclear attack. Our densely populated coastal cities were prime targets for nuclear weapons.

Had the Cold War become "hot", Sydney and Melbourne - not to mention the smaller cities and especially the national capital - could have been obliterated, with their populations, from the face of Australia.

Since September 11, 2001, the need has become even more urgent. We have already seen how vulnerable big cities are to attacks by suicidal fanatics using conventional explosives and fuel-laden aircraft.

One can imagine the fearful carnage and devastation that would occur should such attacks be carried out using nuclear weapons.

It is imperative therefore that all Australian governments, and especially the Commonwealth, take immediate action to launch large-scale and continuing programs to decentralise population, industry and government away from the large coastal cities into regional and rural areas and towns, inland and on the coast.

How can this be done? The Commonwealth - preferably with the co-operation of the states, but without them if they prove unco-operative - should organise referenda in each region of Australia.

Local residents would be asked if they wished their region to become a new state within the Commonwealth of Australia, with the power to elect their own parliament and government, with power to raise their own revenues for exclusive use in the development of their new state.

I am confident that if the question were put to the people of each region the majority would answer "yes".

New South Wales voters might be reminded that the letters "NSW", while supposedly the initials of the name of their state, in reality have come to mean the three principal cities in the state, namely Newcastle, Sydney and Wollongong. Why?

Because the focus of all action by the state government and practically all its expenditure is directed to those three cities, to the almost total neglect of the rest of the state.

And so it is with the other mainland states.

Both major political parties, state and federal, have neglected Australia's need to decentralise. Instead they have restricted themselves only to what they consider to be vote-winning issues, e.g., Medicare, hospitals, education, public transport and law reform.

Thus neither party looks beyond the next election to Australia's ultimate destiny. Their attitude seems to be that the future can take care of itself.

However, I am convinced that Australian voters would overwhelmingly support each region becoming a new state.

These new states, with their own elected governments and the power to raise their own taxes (principally from site revenue), would then encourage any people willing an able to work, be they skilled or unskilled, to move from the big, overcrowded, crime-ridden cities, so vulnerable to attack, to the less vulnerable, more spacious regions.

Viable

The states would grow in population, build roads and railways, establish new industries, and develop farms and towns, until they reached the stage where they become viable political, economic and cultural entities - that is, free states with free and prosperous people, living in a reinvigorated and prosperous Commonwealth of Australia.

This was how the United States of America developed and become the most prosperous and powerful nation on earth. While it may not be possible for Australia to match the material development as the USA, since our continent is less fertile, we could nevertheless make great progress, and increase our population to a degree which would more surely safeguard our security at home and our influence for peace abroad.

  • Don Ford lives in Ashfield, NSW




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm