September 11th 2004

  Buy Issue 2690

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Battle lines drawn for October 9 Federal poll

EDITORIAL: Issues for the Federal Election

FAMILY: Better deal demanded for families

NOT SO DRY CONTINENT: Australia has water options

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Taiwan faces continuing threats from Beijing

POPULATION: Falling birth-rates stir action in Taiwan, Singapore

INDIA: The economic test for India's new government

PEACE-KEEPING: Sudan and the progressive mind

OPINION: The case for new states in Australia

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Howard versus New Class Labor / Tap Tap. Who's there?

CINEMA: Bus 174 - A jolting, two-hour masterpiece

CLIMATE: Global warming - the sceptics have won

DEMOCRACY: Lay your hammer down

Labor's foot-soldiers (letter)

Mondragon: a rejoinder (letter)

The West and Islam (letter)

BOOKS: The Last Valley: Dien Bien Phu and the French defeat in Vietnam

BOOKS: 7 Myths of Working Mothers, by Suzanne Venker

Books promotion page

The case for new states in Australia

by Don Ford

News Weekly, September 11, 2004
There has never been a time in Australia's history when there was a greater need to decentralise our population, economy and government.

From the beginning of the atomic age at the end of World War II, and especially now in the age of terrorism at the beginning of the 21st century, concerned Australians realise the pressing need simultaneously to ease the pressure of population on the already overcrowded and polluted coastal cities, and to encourage people to settle in rural towns and regions, to build up these sparsely populated and economically stagnant localities into thriving, prosperous communities.

Densely populated cities

From 1945, and through the period of the Cold War, we have lived under the threat of nuclear attack. Our densely populated coastal cities were prime targets for nuclear weapons.

Had the Cold War become "hot", Sydney and Melbourne - not to mention the smaller cities and especially the national capital - could have been obliterated, with their populations, from the face of Australia.

Since September 11, 2001, the need has become even more urgent. We have already seen how vulnerable big cities are to attacks by suicidal fanatics using conventional explosives and fuel-laden aircraft.

One can imagine the fearful carnage and devastation that would occur should such attacks be carried out using nuclear weapons.

It is imperative therefore that all Australian governments, and especially the Commonwealth, take immediate action to launch large-scale and continuing programs to decentralise population, industry and government away from the large coastal cities into regional and rural areas and towns, inland and on the coast.

How can this be done? The Commonwealth - preferably with the co-operation of the states, but without them if they prove unco-operative - should organise referenda in each region of Australia.

Local residents would be asked if they wished their region to become a new state within the Commonwealth of Australia, with the power to elect their own parliament and government, with power to raise their own revenues for exclusive use in the development of their new state.

I am confident that if the question were put to the people of each region the majority would answer "yes".

New South Wales voters might be reminded that the letters "NSW", while supposedly the initials of the name of their state, in reality have come to mean the three principal cities in the state, namely Newcastle, Sydney and Wollongong. Why?

Because the focus of all action by the state government and practically all its expenditure is directed to those three cities, to the almost total neglect of the rest of the state.

And so it is with the other mainland states.

Both major political parties, state and federal, have neglected Australia's need to decentralise. Instead they have restricted themselves only to what they consider to be vote-winning issues, e.g., Medicare, hospitals, education, public transport and law reform.

Thus neither party looks beyond the next election to Australia's ultimate destiny. Their attitude seems to be that the future can take care of itself.

However, I am convinced that Australian voters would overwhelmingly support each region becoming a new state.

These new states, with their own elected governments and the power to raise their own taxes (principally from site revenue), would then encourage any people willing an able to work, be they skilled or unskilled, to move from the big, overcrowded, crime-ridden cities, so vulnerable to attack, to the less vulnerable, more spacious regions.


The states would grow in population, build roads and railways, establish new industries, and develop farms and towns, until they reached the stage where they become viable political, economic and cultural entities - that is, free states with free and prosperous people, living in a reinvigorated and prosperous Commonwealth of Australia.

This was how the United States of America developed and become the most prosperous and powerful nation on earth. While it may not be possible for Australia to match the material development as the USA, since our continent is less fertile, we could nevertheless make great progress, and increase our population to a degree which would more surely safeguard our security at home and our influence for peace abroad.

  • Don Ford lives in Ashfield, NSW

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am