October 9th 2004

  Buy Issue 2692

Articles from this issue:

ELECTION 2004: Will Labor, Liberal big-spending promises swing voters?

EDITORIAL: Election auction ignores the real challenge

NATIONAL PARTY: John Anderson accused of misleading voters

EDUCATION: Behind Labor's church school 'hit list'

STRAWS IN THE WIND: The outlaw seas and international terrorism / Renaissance of Australian unionism?

FEDERAL ELECTION: Major parties gag candidates

BIOETHICS: Embryo research and the tooth fairy

MEDICINE: Coma arousal therapy: Dr Ted Freeman's treatment for PVS patients

DRUGS: Parents reject marijuana decriminalisation

AGEING: Wanted: Loving family to adopt 'granddad au pair'

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: End the UN political stand-off against Taiwan

CHINA: Hong Kong elections a clear win for democracy

INDIA: Secularism an absolute necessity for India

POLITICAL IDEAS: Ten principles of a property-owning democracy

Taiwan's exclusion from UN unjustified (letter)

Australia needs infrastructure (letter)

Time for men's policy (letter)

BOOKS: ANTI-AMERICANISM, by Jean-François Revel

BOOKS: THE EMPTY CRADLE, by Phillip Longman

Books promotion page

Will Labor, Liberal big-spending promises swing voters?

News Weekly, October 9, 2004
John Howard's election campaign has been more of a brazen game of defiance than a conventional appeal to the voters.

Having built the foundations of a seemingly impregnable economy, Mr Howard is daring the voters not to risk all by trusting the nation to an alternative team headed by an albeit new and appealing leader in Mark Latham.

Mr Latham's $2.9 billion "Medicare Gold" plan to provide free health care for the over-75s - along with other sweeteners to retirees - is a clear attempt to capture the votes of a section of the electorate which has swung heavily towards John Howard and the Coalition.

Mr Howard is as astute a reader of the public mood as former Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke.

And though he would not admit this publicly, he knows there is a strong level of frustration about his government which no amount of promises or pledges can placate.


The frustration is caused by an accumulation of mistakes and mishaps, avoidable and unavoidable, compounded by the community's natural restlessness for change after eight and a half years.

So Mr Howard has gambled his re-election and a crowning fourth term on his single greatest achievement in government - prosperity.

The Howard boast is uninterrupted economic growth, which has massively increased the wealth of the Australian property class. It has created jobs, but has left a sizeable sector of the community underemployed, including older workers and those trapped in regional black spots and housing commission ghettos.

He has also kept interest rates low for business to thrive and for higher personal debt than any other nation in the world.

How much of this is good management or good fortune - and how long it will last and how long we will all have to pay for the debt to fuel this unprecedented boom - seems to be completely glossed over in the election campaign.

Take the recent history of the great Clinton surplus. This was supposed to pay for the social security bills of generations of Americans, but it was wiped out in a flash by the US recession and the war on terror, and the US Government is now heavily and dangerously in debt.

A sudden jump in unemployment in Australia would see our surplus - and the promises which went with it - evaporate as well.

Will the Howard gamble work?

On a superficial level the following would seem a timid and equivocal prediction, but there are in fact three likely outcomes for the October 9 poll in the following order:

(1) A returned Howard Government, but with a reduced majority,

(2) A hung Parliament controlled by the independent MPs, or

(3) The narrowest of victories for the Labor Party.

Few elections have been more difficult to call. Newspaper opinion polls have contradicted each other, and it would surprise no-one including Mr Howard to see Mr Latham claiming victory on election night.

However, it is safe to assume there will be no landslide win for either side.

High price

Commentators have all but excluded the possibility of the three independents assuming the balance of power in the House of Representatives, yet there is a faint chance of their numbers being increased at this election in the form of Peter King.

Nothing would be more intriguing than seeing Bob Katter, Tony Windsor and Peter Andren becoming kingmakers after the election, and their sympathies are more likely to lean to the conservative side of politics than to Labor.

However, after the appalling way Mr Katter and Mr Windsor have been treated by their ex-National Party colleagues, they would be certain to exact a high price for their support.

The people are getting tired of the Howard Government, but not sick and tired. And they are interested in the Labor Party as an alternative, but not convinced.

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Time and timing are crucial to Cardinal Pell's appeal by Peter Westmore

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

COVER STORY The world has changed: Now for the new order

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm