November 20th 2004

  Buy Issue 2695

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: George W. Bush's new direction

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Latham in denial over election loss

EDUCATION: Dr Nelson's new inquiry into school literacy

ESPIONAGE: Did a Soviet spy penetrate ASIO?

SECRET SERVICE: Lest we forget - a life in the shadows

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Old Moore's Almanac / Twilight of the false gods / Abortions, holocausts, and death-wishes

OPINION: Memo, Mark Latham: It's the family, stupid!

ABORTION: Speaking up for the unborn

CLIMATE: Global warming bombshell - hockey-stick plot used modified data

Why we must decentralise now (letter)

Errors about AQIS (letter)

Iraq war (letter)

Bush's Iraq war 'unlawful and immoral' (letter)

US Elections and abortion (letter)

No mandate for Howard Government (letter)

Left's hypocrisy (letter)

Standing for the DLP (letter)

BOOKS: HOW TO KILL A COUNTRY: Australia's Devastating Trade Deal with the United States

BOOKS: GETTING ON TRACK: A Business Plan for Australia


Books promotion page

Iraq war (letter)

by Alan A. Hoysted

News Weekly, November 20, 2004

Congratulations to Alistair Barros for his excellent article in support of the invasion of Iraq (News Weekly, October 23, 2004). Everyone, including the Labor Party, was convinced that Saddam Hussein had WMDs.

I believe he had ample time to remove them to Syria or bury them. Iraq is a big place.

We know for certain that he had chemical weapons because he had used them on the Kurds. A Sarin gas-shell was recently found.

If he had no WMDs, why did he defy 12 UN resolutions, and hinder and harrass UN inspectors until they left?

We also have the evidence of Kamal Hussein, Saddam's son-in-law, chief organiser of Iraq's weapons program, who defected in 1995. Believing WMDs to be a threat, George W. Bush would have been remiss had he not acted to deny them to terrorists.

Five hundred suicide-bomb kits were found and denied to terrorists.

Having regard to Saddam's cruel and sadistic reign of terror over some decades, would the opponents of this war prefer that Saddam and his crazy, cruel and sadistic sons were still in charge, raping , torturing and murdering tens of thousands of his own people?

The going is tough at the moment, but the best thing true supporters of democracy can do is to stop criticising, support America, and see this through to a successful conclusion. We can and will win if we persevere.

This could be a turning-point in world history. Bugging out is not an option. The consequences of the barbarian terrorists winning are too terrible to contemplate.

Alan A. Hoysted
Thomastown, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am