November 6th 2004

  Buy Issue 2694

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Why Bush is better for Australia ...

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor in shock after its disastrous rout

QUARANTINE: Citrus canker: Biosecurity Australia must be held accountable

ENVIRONMENT: How Howard can neutralise green vote

INTEREST RATES: Myth and reality of Reserve Bank independence

INDONESIA: Yudhoyono's new deal for Australia

TAIWAN: Cross-strait issue a delicate balance

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Not so noble a prize / Wickedness / Demonology / Indonesia

IRAQ WAR: Did Saddam Hussein back al-Qa'ida?

MEDIA: Mark Latham's wrong turns

ABORTION: Facts banish the myth of the 'backyard butcher'

OPINION: How I would tackle poverty

CULTURE: Children's author plumbs new depths

End the shame of ACT pornography (letter)

Unborn child treated as 'a malignant tumour' (letter)

BOOKS: Catholicism, Protestantism And Capitalism, by Amintore Fanfani

Books promotion page

Unborn child treated as 'a malignant tumour' (letter)

by Dr Les Hemingway

News Weekly, November 6, 2004

A recent Medical Journal of Australia article has argued for the removal of all restrictions on abortion.

The article, headed "For Debate: Time to Clarify Australia's Confusing Laws", is by Dr Lachlan J de Crespigny and Dr (Professor) Julian Savulescu.

I have responded, but the journal's editors claim they have no space for every letter published and have had to reject my contribution. To date, they have printed no letters in response to the invitation to debate. So was the invitation false to begin with, or do they not like letters which oppose abortion?

I wrote, "Is the August 16, 2004 'For Debate' article - 'Abortion: Time to clarify Australia's confusing laws' - really for debate? If so, I offer the following:

"The proposed change would make abortions easier to obtain and remove any remaining legal impediment or uncertainty, thereby making the procedure appear uncontentious and ethically indifferent. Is that a good thing?

"Couples seeking abortion treat a child they have conceived as a malignant tumour to be excised as soon as possible. Will people who treat their own descendants in this way show full consideration for the children of asylum-seekers, for indigenous Australians, or for other disadvantaged or marginal groups?

"The golden rule is to treat others as you would like them to treat you. This does not come easily to most of us, but has to be acquired through practice and self-denial. Abortion represents the schoolboy howler version: 'Do one to others before they do one to you'. It cannot foster consideration for others, but must have the opposite effect.

"Do we want a society where people work towards the common good? Or one in which each individual or group strives for its own ends, regardless of who might pay the price? I submit that making abortion easier will promote the second of these outcomes and work against the first."

It seems that my cynical introduction was all too true. The article was not for debate but only to provide support for the abortion industry.

Doctors are being strangled by rules and regulations. But what else does the profession deserve? Those who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants, and we are already well along that road. How much further will the profession fall from grace before it wakes up to the twin evils of abortion and contraception and to the numerous social and medical problems which follow them?

Dr Les Hemingway,
Norlane, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am