May 22nd 2004


  Buy Issue 2682
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: An election winning Budget?

EDITORIAL: Child care funding and the Budget

AGRICULTURE: Sugar package, Clayton's package

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Ethanol for strategic energy self-reliance

STRAWS IN THE WIND: More history wars / Betrayal / Guilt by association / ALP founding

COMMENT: Tougher law enforcement needed to stop drug wars

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: Economist describes CIE report as laughable

Nature says no to same sex marriage (letter)

Vietnam human rights (letter)

Western media hypocrisy (letter)

No choice for mothers (letter)

Marriage unaffordable (letter)

Taiwan and the WHO (letter)

US economic integration defended (letter)

ECONOMY: Manufacturing decline causes foreign debt crisis

Europe's uncertain future

REPORT: More of the same at UN women's conference

COMMENT: Same-sex marriage: there are no limits

BOOKS: EMPIRE: How Britain Made The Modern World, by Niall Ferguson

BOOKS: Alger Hiss's Looking-Glass Wars: The Covert Life of a Soviet Spy, by G. Edward White

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Nature says no to same sex marriage (letter)


by Dr David van Gend

News Weekly, May 22, 2004
Sir,

Nature's job description for a man and a woman is clear and challenging: form a breeding pair, build a sturdy nest, conceive and nurture the next generation. Forming a family is the core business of biology, and from the dawn of time it has been the core business of tribe and society, a matter of survival. Only decadent cultures which have lost touch with nature forget this fact of life.

Nature has no job description for homosexuals, whose bizarre sexual activities are biologically irrelevant. They may be great activist judges and doctors, but as far as the essential social task of procreation goes, gays need not apply.

Unless, of course, a gay man joins the thousands who have shown both the will and the therapeutic persistence to achieve a complete change to heterosexuality, so becoming biologically marriageable.

What we call marriage, and what other animals call pair-bonding, can only ever be about Mum, Dad and the kids. And our kids need both the comforting breast of a mother, and the protection and playful rough and tumble of a father. No little boy must be forced into a household where two "married" men play mummies and daddies. Nature says no.

Dr David van Gend,
Toowoomba, Qld




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am