June 19th 2004


  Buy Issue 2684
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The legacy of Ronald Reagan

Remembering Reagan

CANBERRA OBSERVED : Coalition, Labor split widens over Iraq

TRADE: Behind Iraq's $700 million wheat debt

FEDERAL: Labor Left hopes to pigeon-hole Marriage Bill

RELIGION: Costello attacked over thanksgiving speech

QUEENSLAND: Labor makes push for ethanol-sugar vote

OPINION: Coalition defends its sugar package

POLITICAL IDEAS: Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Conservatism's radical prophet

QUARANTINE : Biosecurity inflames fire blight fears

CHILDREN AT RISK: Protecting children from Internet porn

DRUGS: Redfern riot linked to heroin trade

CANADA: Health care primary focus in Canadian election

INDIA: What went wrong with the BJP?

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Drums on the Congo / The next moonlight state?

DEMUTUALISATION: Credit unions an endangered species

Britain and Palestine (letter)

Worker co-ops (letter)

BOOKS: WHY OUR SCHOOLS ARE FAILING, By Kevin Donnelly

BOOKS: Taking Sex Differences Seriously, by Steven Rhoads

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Britain and Palestine (letter)


by Max Teichmann

News Weekly, June 19, 2004
Sir,

Dr Partington's letter (News Weekly, June 5, 2004) concerning a piece I wrote on Lawrence of Arabia and the post-1918 settlement gives me a chance to provide a few extra facts.

I'll start with Palestine, which I didn't really discuss, although in reviews of various Jewish writers here and in the Adelaide Review, I did discuss the issues - at length.

I don't remember any dissonant notes from readers then.

I won't repeat all of it here - although I suspect a few people might think Palestine is and was the most important issue.

It wasn't then, it has become far more stressful, but so have many other areas. Indeed, we may be facing one coalescing conflict region.

The Zionists could hardly be criticised at that time. They had said they wanted a National Home: they lobbied the British, successfully; and then started building enclaves by buying Arab land. The sheikhs, the rich landowners, sold them that land, abandoned the people on it and pocketed the money. One gets the feeling they would have sold it to anyone. People like Chaim Weizmann were shocked, saying that these Arab leaders looked like Arab nationalists on the outside but were traitors to their people on the inside.

The British had the responsibility of looking after both communities, but failed.

From that time on, rank-and-file Arabs distrusted leaders who had any dealings with the Jews or the West.

That legacy of suspicion has fed Arab extremism and encouraged radical Arab clerics. But ... I don't see the Zionists had a duty to go in deputation to Whitehall to ask the British to help the Arabs more and them less.

As to the remainder of Mr Partington's concerns: no, no one proposed a single state containing the various peoples in the whole area. But at any level, honest negotiations with the locals - at a time when hope and trust remained - might have worked wonders. But ...the deals were cut by the Anglo-French, the inhabitants presented with faits accomplis.

When they got rulers, these were by grace and favour of the West. This undermined the rulers' chances of legitimacy from the beginning and still remains a problem for Arab rulers. Hence a certain preference for wild cards who will say they hate the West and, nowadays, the Jews, and they will do things their way: Nasser, Gaddafi, Khomeini, Arafat.

Yes some Arabs did revolt in the 1920s, e.g. Iraq and the Kurds. Colonial Secretary Churchill strongly advocated the use of poison gas; whole-heartedly supported by Henry Wilson, the military's Chief-of Staff, who said, "I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes."

Sir Henry was assassinated in 1922 by Sinn Feiners.

Young Bomber Harris asked for the chance to show the potency of the new air power by selecting, and destroying, whole villages. His wish was granted. The Kurds were ... pacified.

Although I found copious evidence in Chums and the Boys' Own Annual - I must confess I found very little signs of British "fair play" here; but perhaps we should hail a passing Irishman and ask his opinion.

Max Teichmann,
Fitzroy, Vic




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

MARRIAGE The issue, Bill, is transgender marriage

EDITORIAL Shorten's agenda will cripple Australia

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE The media, champions for free speech and rights (for the media), demonstrate predictable inability to contain bias on postal vote

FEDERAL POLITICS Backbench marriage push angers Coalition colleagues

CANBERRA OBSERVED Candidates must polish their paperwork skills

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Hundreds of doctors call on AMA to withdraw defective statement on same-sex marriage

COVER STORY The lessons for euthanasia are there for the learning



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am