July 31st 2004


  Buy Issue 2687
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: What the COAG Water Agreement means

EDITORIAL: Issues facing the Howard Government

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kim Beazley's return masks Labor's divisions over US

AUSFTA: Will Green preferences sink trade agreement?

NATIONAL COMPETITION POLICY: SA Government heads towards dismantling single selling-desk for barley

DEREGULATION: Stock Journal survey rejects new SA Barley Export Bill

QUARANTINE BREACH: Inquiry needed on citrus canker

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Boswell sees red over Senate marriage delay

EDUCATION: School vouchers - giving power back to parents

SOCIAL POLICY: Singapore's Provident Fund adapts to new realities

FILM: Appeals against degrading movies rejected

MEDIA: Victory on TV Code of Practice

HEALTH: Abortion causes uterine damage

VICTORIA: Are we facing a long dry spell?

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Peacock Throne / The Stasi never died / Supersized

CINEMA: Whatever happened to the family film?

Distributism defended (letter)

People without land (letter)

Ethanol industry viable (letter)

OBITUARY: Vale Brian Nash

OBITUARY: Vale Martin Klibbe

BOOKS: Nightmare of the Prophet, by Paul Gray

BOOKS: Memo for a Saner World, by Bob Brown

BOOKS: So Monstrous A Travesty, by Ross McMullin

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Ethanol industry viable (letter)


by Colin Teese

News Weekly, July 31, 2004
Sir,

De-Anne Kelly, Federal Member for the Queensland sugar seat of Dawson, says Pat Byrne should know better, that Brazil may want Australia to produce ethanol, but that Brazil would compete with Australia such that its low-valued exchange rate would see Australian producers receive little from exporting ethanol to Japan (News Weekly, July 17, 2004).

It is Mrs Kelly who should know better. She is senior National Party leader and a Federal MP in Central Queensland, a huge coal-exporting region.

She should know that Japan has always been able to buy all its coal needs from Australia cheaper than from anywhere else in the world, but it doesn't.

Resource-poor Japan has a policy of spreading its risk on vital resource imports, for example, by purchasing coal from a number of other countries at a higher price than it could buy from Australia.

Similarly, Japan can buy its oil cheapest from the Middle East, but because of instability in the region, it is looking to also buy much more expensive oil from Russia.

Therefore, there is little reason to believe that Japan would not pay a differential price for ethanol.

Brazil strategically developed its ethanol industry to supply the domestic market, a base platform for a huge export industry.

Mrs Kelly's government has the ideal opportunity to establish an ethanol industry in Australia by mandating ethanol in fuel, and the further opportunity to turn ethanol into a new export industry for the country.

If the Coalition refuses to act on the issue, perhaps Labor will and then the sugar seats would become at risk.

Colin Teese,
Parkville, Vic




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Euthanasia: shutting up by shouting down

ENERGY Hazelwood is vital to Australia's power supply

MULTICULTURALISM First among equals or an also-ran culture?

EUTHANASIA British actress tells it like it is

EDITORIAL Gas, power crises are due to renewables obsession by Peter Westmore

COVER STORY Decentralisation: an undeveloped country

ABORTION Law condones the act as it criminalises the image



News and views from around the world



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am