July 31st 2004

  Buy Issue 2687

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: What the COAG Water Agreement means

EDITORIAL: Issues facing the Howard Government

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kim Beazley's return masks Labor's divisions over US

AUSFTA: Will Green preferences sink trade agreement?

NATIONAL COMPETITION POLICY: SA Government heads towards dismantling single selling-desk for barley

DEREGULATION: Stock Journal survey rejects new SA Barley Export Bill

QUARANTINE BREACH: Inquiry needed on citrus canker

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Boswell sees red over Senate marriage delay

EDUCATION: School vouchers - giving power back to parents

SOCIAL POLICY: Singapore's Provident Fund adapts to new realities

FILM: Appeals against degrading movies rejected

MEDIA: Victory on TV Code of Practice

HEALTH: Abortion causes uterine damage

VICTORIA: Are we facing a long dry spell?

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Peacock Throne / The Stasi never died / Supersized

CINEMA: Whatever happened to the family film?

Distributism defended (letter)

People without land (letter)

Ethanol industry viable (letter)

OBITUARY: Vale Brian Nash

OBITUARY: Vale Martin Klibbe

BOOKS: Nightmare of the Prophet, by Paul Gray

BOOKS: Memo for a Saner World, by Bob Brown

BOOKS: So Monstrous A Travesty, by Ross McMullin

Books promotion page

Stock Journal survey rejects new SA Barley Export Bill

by Paul Russell

News Weekly, July 31, 2004
A recent survey of South Australian barley-growers, conducted by the Stock Journal, shows that 80 per cent of grain-growers do not want to see the destruction of the single selling-desk.

"This study reinforces Stock Journal's 2003 survey that showed 90% of growers wanted ABB to keep the single selling-desk and believed it delivered premium prices," says Stock Journal's Kate Dowler (July 13, 2004).

The figures varied across the State, reflecting crop and growing season variations and access to export and/or local markets. Growers closest to the Victorian border showed the least inclination to keeping the single selling-desk and most were in favour of the GLA operating in South Australia. These growers have witnessed their counterparts across the border having access to a deregulated market post the 2001 changes. Greener fields, perhaps?

But will deregulation, or a choice between the single selling-desk and other licensed buyers/exporters, deliver sustained advantages to growers?

One grower, Brendan Ramsey, echoed the concerns of many: "Initially, if a GLA is introduced, prices will lift slightly but, long-term prices will lower and disadvantage farmers. They would compete against each other and markets would be cherry-picked," said Mr. Ramsey (Stock Journal, July 13, 2004).

  • Paul Russell

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am