January 31st 2004

  Buy Issue 2674

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: More surprises likely in Queensland poll

EDITORIAL: The dark side of the Internet

TRANSPORT: Waterfall crash report indicts NSW State Rail Authority

CANBERRA OBSERVED : Vultures circle wounded Democrats

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Paper children / The peripatetics / The serious people we are losing

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Mixed outcome on same-sex bill

ECONOMY: Amend Trade Practices Act to protect small business

Super rethink needed (letter)

Population: quality, not quantity (letter)

Upgrade our rail system (letter)

FAMILY: Fatherhood and marriage - a vital connection

COMMENT: Castro's legacy: the New Left

TAIWAN: March election a key issue in China

TRADE: NAFTA - lessons for Australia

BOOKS: DIGNIFIED AND EFFICIENT: The British Monarchy in the Twentieth Century

BOOKS: A NEW CITY: Photographs of Melbourne's Land Boom, edited by Ian Morrison

Books promotion page

Population: quality, not quantity (letter)

by R. Hughes

News Weekly, January 31, 2004

I refer to your editorial on the population debate in the issue of November 29, 2003, and offer the following comments.

There seems little correlation between the size of a country's population and its living standards; mini-states like Singapore and Monaco have higher living standards than massively populated states like India and Indonesia.

Australia had one of the highest rates of population growth in the Western world last century, but in relative terms, our per capita national income fell.

Immigration will do very little to stop the "greying" of our population, as migrants have started to age before they enter the country.

A massive increase in immigration will have no more effect on slowing down the ageing of our population than will a tiny increase in the birthrate.

Immigration is not helping develop our remote and unpopulated regions, and in fact, lately the Northern Territory has attracted only one-tenth of one percent of our net overseas migration. With lower birthrates and increasing living standards, the areas where our more capable migrants could be recruited will, to some extent, have dried up as sources of migrants.

This will leave us with the option of lowering the intake or recruiting from the less successful populations and importing the sort of problems that make poor countries poor.

The debate should shift away from simply considering numbers and take into account quality. We should be pursuing policies that give us an intelligent and vigorous population that can handle the challenges of the 21st century.

R. Hughes,
Strathfield, NSW

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am