February 14th 2004


  Buy Issue 2675
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Australia-US free trade agreement: free trade or fair trade?

EDITORIAL: Bush and Iraq: the essential issues

ELECTION: How Labor outgunned the Coalition in Queensland

AGRICULTURE: Political will needed to solve dairy industry crisis

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Latham catches government on wrong foot

OPINION: Regionalism the solution to excessive centralism

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Deschooling or reschooling? / Oxbridge / Pluralism

Death ethics (letter)

Front and centre (letter)

CANADA: Exposing the myths behind 'free market' agriculture policy

ISLAM: Musharraf's ambitious quest to lead the Islamic world

Bird flu cover-up shows that change in China comes slowly

COMMENT: Is President Bush really "dumb"?

BOOKS: Divorce Law and the Future of Marriage, by Barry Maley

BOOKS: FRAUDING OF ELECTIONS? by Amy McGrath

MUSIC: Reflections for Peace, Joy and Serenity

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CANBERRA OBSERVED:
Latham catches government on wrong foot




News Weekly, February 14, 2004
Either out of desperation or resignation, the Labor Party has finally fallen in behind Mark Latham, with its National Conference uniting more firmly behind its new leader than at any time since the early days of Paul Keating, more than a decade ago.

Latham has defied his critics, particularly those in the Liberal Party who believed he was easy pickings, and the new-look national conference has rubber-stamped the most important of his key policies.

While making some concessions on tax cuts for the wealthy and blunting some harsh economic "reform" measures in a bid to appease the unions, Latham was able to secure solid party backing going into the election year.

Ironically, the man he displaced, Simon Crean, played a significant role in these behind-the-scenes negotiations, working to placate the various strident groups in the party to win these concessions.

Misjudged strategy

The Liberal Party has also in part helped Mr Latham's easy entré into the leadership through a serious underestimation of his political skills.

They believed Latham to be either mad or accident prone, or possibly both, and that he would shoot himself in the foot within a month of his leadership.

In fact, Mr Latham is an intelligent and capable politician who has been carefully trained and cultivated by the Labor Party since he was a boy. His so-called madness and eratic policy ideas is more likely to have been a fairly calculated way of differentiating himself from his peers - fast-tracking his way to the top of the party.

Latham was always going to lead the Labor Party. It was just a matter of when. The crippled Crean leadership and the Beazley paralysis brought forward that outcome by a couple of terms. The Liberals also made a serious tactical error when Latham was first appointed.

Before the December leadership bout they repeatedly said that the personality of the leadership of the Labor Party (either Crean or Beazley) was irrelevant, and that it was only the party's failed policies which mattered.

But after the ballot and Latham's surprise victory, key ministers Peter Costello and Tony Abbott launched a series of personal attacks, attempting to dismantle the man rather than the policies.

The tactic backfired because they actually provided Latham with an extra boost. Despite his own track record for belligerent behaviour, people previously disinterested in politics wanted to know more about the man who had raised such heat from the Liberal leadership.

Latham appeals because he is different. He has a few interesting ideas which he has had the discipline to craft into books (as opposed to Peter Costello who sprouts half-baked ideas in the occasional forgettable speech).

Mr Latham is also straight-talking and a genuine product of a working class or perhaps the non-working class (welfare) background. And, if we are to believed, he appears to be in politics because he genuinely wants to help the more unfortunate Australians who are trapped in that black hole of dependancy and government handouts, and who need a hand-up rather than a hand-out.

This is certainly a refreshing change from many ambitious Labor figures in Australia who are either in politics as a career path, or social change theorists and engineers.

In fact, if there is one way to differentiate Mark Latham from just about all his colleagues is that he is the first Labor figure in memory who has been an open champion of the poor, which is in itself an indictment of the Labor Party.

For all that, Latham is green and still largely untested in the political arena, and very significantly he owes his ascendancy to the party's left.

During an extended honeymoon period he will not be put under the microscope on the policies which matter, mainly taxation and where and how government money will be spent and cut. That will come in time.

It has been said repeatedly that Mr Howard is yet to find the chink in the armour, and that he is floundering and "rattled".

This is true to a certain extent while Mr Howard tries to find his way around a man he never expected to be leader.

More importantly, however, the Prime Minister will have to begin to think about his own alternative fourth term agenda to match Labor's raft of new ideas.

In other words, if it wants to win another term the Government has to stop giving Latham oxygen and get on with the business of government.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm