December 18th 2004

  Buy Issue 2697

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Dr Strangeloves' Brave New World

ECONOMICS: Australia's $403 billion foreign debt: hail the banana republic!

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Utter failure of the Latham experiment

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Where Labor failed itself - and Australia

SCHOOL EDUCATION: 'Fuzzy maths' doesn't add up

INTERNET PORNOGRAPHY: Telcos in bed with pornographers

ABORTION: Late-term abortion in Australia

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Eureka - we lost it! / The coming down of the wall / Favourite Books / Home alone

EASTERN EUROPE: Ukraine turns to the West?

PAKISTAN: Military corruption robs country's poor

UNITED NATIONS: Secretary-General Kofi Annan must resign

Long live Eureka (letter)

Kath and Kim land (letter)

Crusades re-examined (letter)

CINEMA: Japanese animation sweeping the West

BOOKS: D-DAY, by Martin Gilbert

BOOKS: THE DICTATORS: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia, by Richard Overy

BOOKS: EPIDEMIC: How Teen Sex is Killing our Kids, by Meg Meeker MD

Books promotion page

Crusades re-examined (letter)

by Damian Wyld

News Weekly, December 18, 2004

While I commend Bill Muehlenberg for his interesting review of Bernard Lewis' book The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, I am quite surprised by some of Mr Muehlenberg's observations (News Weekly, December 4).

In his comparison of the Islamic jihad and the Christian Crusades, Mr Muehlenberg suggests that the latter "were a late, limited and perverted trajectory of Christianity".

Given the recent public renewal of interest in this aspect of our cultural heritage, I find it unfortunate that some choose to approach it from an apologetic angle, giving further ammunition to revisionist historians who would paint the period as just an early jaunt by nasty Western imperialists.

In suggesting the Crusades were "late", when does Mr Muehlenberg suggest they should have begun (particularly if, as he seems to imply, they should not have occurred at all)?

Aside from this, crusades in all but name had already been occurring in both East and West for centuries (the Reconquista, for example).

That they were "limited" is a curious claim. It completely ignores the fact that crusades and similar conflicts continued until relatively modern times (the Battle of Lepanto, the Turkish siege of Vienna and the maritime endeavours of the Knights of Malta - well into the 18th century - spring to mind).

Pope Pius XII even said in his Christmas speech of 1956 that he had considered calling a crusade to free Hungary.

To claim the Crusades were "limited" also ignores the incredibly diverse regions in which they were employed, ranging from the Holy Land, to Spain and even the Baltic and beyond.

Personally, I find the assertion that the Crusades were a "perverted trajectory of Christianity" to be a slight, not only on the advocates and participants of the Crusades (including saints in both categories), but also on the Faith they held - a faith still held by many.

Such an assertion demonstrates a misunderstanding of the theological underpinnings of what was always a temporal struggle in defence of Christians and Christendom.

This would seem to me a very noble cause.

Damian Wyld,
Oakden, SA

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

CLIMATE POLITICS Business joins Big Brother in climate-change chorus

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm