August 28th 2004


  Buy Issue 2689
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The Olympics return to Athens ...

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Mark Latham caves in on free trade deal

MARRIAGE ACT: Major triumph for marriage in Australia

FAMILY: Hard-won victory on Marriage Amendment Bill

YOUTH: X and Y generations suffer intergenerational theft

POPULATION PART ONE: What abortion is costing Australia

POPULATION PART TWO: The economic cause of falling fertility

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Growing old disgracefully

FAMILY LAW: Dads bear the burden of proof

THE MEDIA: Mark Latham and Big Brother

CINEMA: FILM REVIEW - Gillo Pontecorvo's 'The Battle of Algiers'

Lies, damned lies and coathangers (letter)

John F. Kennedy's reputation (letter)

Sugar industry sold short (letter)

BOOKS: KOKODA, by Peter FitzSimons

BOOKS: HIS DARK MATERIALS: Northern Lights, The Subtle Knife, The Amber Spyglass, by Philip Pullman

2004 Fighting Fund launched

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

Sugar industry sold short (letter)


by Margaret Menzel

News Weekly, August 28, 2004
Sir,

A valid question has been posed in recent media regarding cane-farming families and just what they are asking from governments and why indeed they are "different" from other small business owners.

The simple answer is that governments do not dictate to small business owners the price at which they must sell their goods. Nor do they dictate a price that is less than their cost of production, and in fact less than half of the average world cost of production.

Sugar producers, however, are forced to accept such a price under National Competition Policy, by ministerial directive. In other words, since 1996, they have been forced to accept a price that has no bearing on their cost of production or the Australian input costs they must address.

No other country in the world directs that their sugar producers accept such a price on their domestic market. Moreover, other sugar producers worldwide receive up to four times the price our growers are paid, with many also sharing in value-added products, such as co-generation of electricity, molasses, ethanol, bio-plastics, pharmaceutical waxes, etc. Queensland cane-farmers are paid on their CCS (sugar content) alone, with the milling companies profiting from all additional products.

Does the consumer benefit? No, because there is no requirement that the lower prices be passed on to the consumer. In fact, since 1996 the prices of sugar and manufactured sugar products have risen substantially while cane-farmers have received less.

From last season's crop, the average Queensland cane-farmer received around 11 cents per kg of sugar, the refiners charged up to 80 cents per kg, and packagers received between 15-25 cents per kg (just to bag it). On the shelf, sachets of sugar were sold at up to $6.38 per kg.

Cane-farmers are not asking for handouts from taxpayers: they are asking for government policy to reflect similar policies to those imposed on our competitor nations, with similar considerations given. If we are being asked to live on a level playing-field, then "level" it should be - not remunerated at one quarter of the price of our major competitors.

Our cane-farmers are more competitive and cost-effective than those in any other nation on earth. No business should be forced to sell their product at less than a third of world prices by government diktat, but cane-farmers are!

Margaret Menzel,
Claredale, North Queensland




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm