August 28th 2004

  Buy Issue 2689

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The Olympics return to Athens ...

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Mark Latham caves in on free trade deal

MARRIAGE ACT: Major triumph for marriage in Australia

FAMILY: Hard-won victory on Marriage Amendment Bill

YOUTH: X and Y generations suffer intergenerational theft

POPULATION PART ONE: What abortion is costing Australia

POPULATION PART TWO: The economic cause of falling fertility

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Growing old disgracefully

FAMILY LAW: Dads bear the burden of proof

THE MEDIA: Mark Latham and Big Brother

CINEMA: FILM REVIEW - Gillo Pontecorvo's 'The Battle of Algiers'

Lies, damned lies and coathangers (letter)

John F. Kennedy's reputation (letter)

Sugar industry sold short (letter)

BOOKS: KOKODA, by Peter FitzSimons

BOOKS: HIS DARK MATERIALS: Northern Lights, The Subtle Knife, The Amber Spyglass, by Philip Pullman

2004 Fighting Fund launched

Books promotion page

Sugar industry sold short (letter)

by Margaret Menzel

News Weekly, August 28, 2004

A valid question has been posed in recent media regarding cane-farming families and just what they are asking from governments and why indeed they are "different" from other small business owners.

The simple answer is that governments do not dictate to small business owners the price at which they must sell their goods. Nor do they dictate a price that is less than their cost of production, and in fact less than half of the average world cost of production.

Sugar producers, however, are forced to accept such a price under National Competition Policy, by ministerial directive. In other words, since 1996, they have been forced to accept a price that has no bearing on their cost of production or the Australian input costs they must address.

No other country in the world directs that their sugar producers accept such a price on their domestic market. Moreover, other sugar producers worldwide receive up to four times the price our growers are paid, with many also sharing in value-added products, such as co-generation of electricity, molasses, ethanol, bio-plastics, pharmaceutical waxes, etc. Queensland cane-farmers are paid on their CCS (sugar content) alone, with the milling companies profiting from all additional products.

Does the consumer benefit? No, because there is no requirement that the lower prices be passed on to the consumer. In fact, since 1996 the prices of sugar and manufactured sugar products have risen substantially while cane-farmers have received less.

From last season's crop, the average Queensland cane-farmer received around 11 cents per kg of sugar, the refiners charged up to 80 cents per kg, and packagers received between 15-25 cents per kg (just to bag it). On the shelf, sachets of sugar were sold at up to $6.38 per kg.

Cane-farmers are not asking for handouts from taxpayers: they are asking for government policy to reflect similar policies to those imposed on our competitor nations, with similar considerations given. If we are being asked to live on a level playing-field, then "level" it should be - not remunerated at one quarter of the price of our major competitors.

Our cane-farmers are more competitive and cost-effective than those in any other nation on earth. No business should be forced to sell their product at less than a third of world prices by government diktat, but cane-farmers are!

Margaret Menzel,
Claredale, North Queensland

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs

News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am