August 28th 2004

  Buy Issue 2689

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The Olympics return to Athens ...

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Mark Latham caves in on free trade deal

MARRIAGE ACT: Major triumph for marriage in Australia

FAMILY: Hard-won victory on Marriage Amendment Bill

YOUTH: X and Y generations suffer intergenerational theft

POPULATION PART ONE: What abortion is costing Australia

POPULATION PART TWO: The economic cause of falling fertility

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Growing old disgracefully

FAMILY LAW: Dads bear the burden of proof

THE MEDIA: Mark Latham and Big Brother

CINEMA: FILM REVIEW - Gillo Pontecorvo's 'The Battle of Algiers'

Lies, damned lies and coathangers (letter)

John F. Kennedy's reputation (letter)

Sugar industry sold short (letter)

BOOKS: KOKODA, by Peter FitzSimons

BOOKS: HIS DARK MATERIALS: Northern Lights, The Subtle Knife, The Amber Spyglass, by Philip Pullman

2004 Fighting Fund launched

Books promotion page

Hard-won victory on Marriage Amendment Bill

by Richard Egan

News Weekly, August 28, 2004
In June 2003, the Supreme Court of Ontario changed the common law definition of marriage to accommodate same-sex couples. News Weekly reported that this finding had grave implications for Australia.

The passage of the Marriage Amendment Bill 2004 has forestalled this particular threat to marriage.

It will preclude any recognition by Australian officials or judges of same-sex marriages contracted overseas in places such as Ontario, Quebec or Massachusetts where same-sex marriage has been legalised by court order.

Labor's support for the passage of the Bill finally gave effect to an earlier Caucus decision to support the Howard Government's proposal to incorporate the traditional definition of marriage in the Marriage Act 1961.

However, Labor had previously derailed the Government's efforts to pass this legislation. An earlier version, the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill 2004 was referred to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee by the Senate, with Labor voting with the Australian Democrats to ensure this Committee was not due to report until October 7. This clearly created the risk that the Bill could not be voted on before the Parliament was dissolved for an election.

The Government responded to this by introducing a new version of the Bill, the Marriage Amendment Bill 2004. This Bill did not include adoption provisions. Nonetheless, on June 24 Labor voted in the Senate against the first reading of this Bill.

In response to these actions of the ALP, the National Civic Council and the Australian Family Association initiated a major campaign to persuade Labor to stop its stalling tactics and support the passage of the Marriage Amendment Bill 2004 during the August Senate sitting.

Many of our supporters telephoned Labor leader Mark Latham and local Labor MPs and Senators as we requested. Along with other pro-family groups, we generated thousands of submissions to the Senate inquiry.

It was at this Forum on August 4, that Nicola Roxon, Labor's shadow attorney-general, announced that if the Marriage Amendment Bill 2004 was re-introduced to the Senate during that fortnight then Labor would vote for its passage. Subsequent efforts by the homosexual lobby and its supporters in shadow cabinet and caucus to reverse this commitment were resisted by Mark Latham.

It is clear that this outcome is a victory for the family, for grassroots democracy and for the future of Australia. It is also of great encouragement to our friends in the United States and elsewhere who are engaged in a similar battle for marriage.

While we are grateful to those within the Labor Party who argued vigorously for this course of action, it is important to note that Labor has restated its commitment to give legal recognition to same-sex couples.

Just as Labor governments have done in almost every State and Territory, if Labor wins the Federal election they will amend every piece of Federal legislation - other than the Marriage Act 1961 - to secure the same benefits for same-sex couples as are given by Federal legislation to married couples and opposite-sex de facto couples. This would include superannuation, social security, veterans' benefits and access to the Family Court of Australia for division of property following separation.

While we should savour this very significant victory, we should also realise that the fight for marriage is not over yet.

We are grateful to all of our supporters who acted on our call to arms and contributed to this victory.

  • Richard Egan is WA state president of the National Civic Council.

  • See also the Australian Family Association web site for articles about the gender agenda, the powerful homosexual lobby and threats to marriage and family -

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am