April 10th 2004


  Buy Issue 2679
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Economic underclass behind marriage and fertility decline

EDITORIAL: Uncommunicative patients - a call on our compassion

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Latham Iraq gaffe signals the honeymoon is over

STRAWS IN THE WIND: The next Four Corners? / Granada

SOCIETY: Who benefits from drugs?

AGRICULTURE: Farmers rallying to fight for industries

ECONOMY: Australia's foreign debt set to grow

The Passion (letter)

Sugar prices (letter)

Tobacco and pharmaceuticals (letter)

Ageing population (letter)

ETHICS: The ethical responsibility of a Christian politician

ECONOMY: US-Australia Free trade agreement and the national interest

TAIWAN ELECTION: Saved by commonsense

PAKISTAN: Inside Pakistan's nuclear weapons program

HONG KONG: Poll battle looms over democratic reforms

BOOKS: Benign or Imperial? Reflections on American Hegemony, by Owen Harries

FILM REVIEW: The Last Samurai

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

Ageing population (letter)


by Janos Paskandy

News Weekly, April 10, 2004
Sir,

I couldn't agree more with your article, "Band-aids won't solve Australia's ageing problem" (NW, March 13), but as a Hungarian proverb says: "Blind chickens find grain too". Of the four options our Treasurer listed, the one that would have retirees not take their lump sum and keep on working longer may well be the best option, if developed a little further.

Taking a lump sum at retirement and using it to fulfill a life's dream was, and is, the primary long-term motivator to battle on for many of us, no matter what. It allows us to make sacrifices and do the right thing by having children in the first place, sending them to an independent school, driving them from sporting activities to the music lessons etc, instead of spending time and money on ourselves, driving flash cars and/or regularly holidaying overseas. It will be all right when we retire.

Costello's idea would take that motivator away and shatter many decent and dutiful citizens' life-long dream. It would be most unfair to punish those, who have made the right choice and provided society with the next generation of taxpayers. If, however, the idea would become means-tested to the number of children in a family, the picture would be quite different.

A no-children, no-lump sum policy, with the old-age pension means-tested to the number of taxpayers people gave society, could go a very long way not only to band-aiding the taxpayer shortage, but to cure many ills of today's society, including those that contribute to the ageing problem.

Janos Paskandy,
Mirabooka, WA




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm