October 18th 2003


  Buy Issue 2668
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: ENVIRONMENT: Don't spoil a good story with the facts ...

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Reshuffling the decks

AGRICULTURE: Unrestricted water trading a danger to farmers

FEDERAL ELECTION: Deregulation, drought, the dollar and the $7.5 billion surplus

FAMILY: AFA Conference calls for strengthening of marriage law

COMMENT: Poor always the losers in a middle class game

LETTERS: WA capitulates on Competition Policy (letter)

LETTERS: Taiwan and the UN (letter)

LETTERS: First Mildura Irrigation Trust (letter)

LETTERS: Rural economy (letter)

LETTERS: The future of rail (letter)

TAIWAN: Making strides in biotech

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Flying down to Rio / Shooting stars and black holes / Digging holes and filling them up again

RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS: Dr Pell's new appointment welcomed

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

LETTERS:
Rural economy (letter)


by H.S. Spence

News Weekly, October 18, 2003
Sir,

As a farmer for half of my 92 years, I was very interested in the article in News Weekly, (September 20, 2003), about the issues behind the rural crisis.

I was a member of one of the rural marketing boards which you mention.

It was a Labor Government in the early 1920s which inaugurated these commodity boards.

In those far off days, a considerable number of towns-folk would have had some relatives farming and would therefore have been aware of any event affecting farmers' living conditions.

This would have included politicians of the day also.

Your description of farmers as "price takers" not "price makers" is very much the position that they were in prior to being given control of their industries.

Wheat growers were just sitting ducks in Queensland, and received much less for their grain than their brother wheat farmers in NSW, where the buyers came from.

All that they could do was complain and accept what they were offered.

I am surprised to hear that there is opposition to the "Single Selling Desk" idea which works in the farmers' interest.

It does away with competition between different sellers, thus enabling farmers to fix their selling price instead of buyers combining to fix the price offered to growers of commodities.

The role of supermarkets in the price fixing for locally produced vegetables, milk and eggs, which have a short prime life is also noted, and when the largest of these buyers combine in their buying, the farmer is at their mercy.

As for passing the arranged cheap prices on to the house-wife, that will never happen.

The shareholders must get a good dividend. Of course farming is a way of life rather than an occupation.

H.S. Spence
Rockhampton, Qld




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am