November 1st 2003

  Buy Issue 2669

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: France and Italy address fertility crisis

EDITORIAL: Bushfires: why the nightmare will be repeated

CANBERRA OBSERVED : Reforming the Senate?

MEDIA: Packer's media-gambling alliance

HEALTH: Abortion-Breast Cancer cover-up continues

FAMILY: Preserving marriage in Australia

AGRICULTURE: Mandate ethanol or sugar industry faces collapse

LETTERS: Time for farmers to wake up (letter)

LETTERS: New TV code of practice (letter)

LETTERS: Special needs, special treasures (letter)

LETTERS: New use for sugar cane trash (letter)

LETTERS: Nuclear menace (letter)

HEALTH WATCH: The 'morning after' pill: coming soon to a school near you?

WATER: Federals distance themselves from 'The Living Murray'

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Jim Cairns remembered

COMMENT: SBS programming questioned by Vietnamese community

ASIA: Siberia - China's 'great game' to reshape Asian region

COMMENT: Don't forget the threat from North Korea

Hong Kong: next elections a test for Beijing

Books promotion page

Special needs, special treasures (letter)

by Frank Bellet

News Weekly, November 1, 2003

Recently I was pleasantly surprised with an interview on the ABC's 7:30 Report.

A young Australian scientist has discovered a procedure, whereby an unborn child can be tested for Down's Syndrome at any time in the pregnancy, without damaging the child in the womb.

Although the scientist put a positive spin on the documentary, claiming this would shield the mother from the "traumatic shock" when told of the situation after the birth, the nagging question remained that this would surely result in an increase in abortions, backed up by the figure of 98% attributed to a survey of women, who discovered during a pregnancy that their child had Down Syndrome and elected to terminate its life.

The interviewer spoke with a young woman in raptures over her little girl, who had Down Syndrome.

The woman revealed how much joy the child brought into her life.

She added that this attitude was in deep contrast to the despair she felt just after the child was born.

Asked what she would have done if she had known in advance of her child's condition, she replied, "I would have had a termination".

Much later in the segment the interviewer put it to her that this newly discovered scientific procedure would surely result in more abortions in relation to Down Syndrome children.

This same mother was horrified at the suggestion. She said there is no way she would part with her "beautiful little girl".

Frank Bellet
Petrie, Qld

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am