November 1st 2003

  Buy Issue 2669

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: France and Italy address fertility crisis

EDITORIAL: Bushfires: why the nightmare will be repeated

CANBERRA OBSERVED : Reforming the Senate?

MEDIA: Packer's media-gambling alliance

HEALTH: Abortion-Breast Cancer cover-up continues

FAMILY: Preserving marriage in Australia

AGRICULTURE: Mandate ethanol or sugar industry faces collapse

LETTERS: Time for farmers to wake up (letter)

LETTERS: New TV code of practice (letter)

LETTERS: Special needs, special treasures (letter)

LETTERS: New use for sugar cane trash (letter)

LETTERS: Nuclear menace (letter)

HEALTH WATCH: The 'morning after' pill: coming soon to a school near you?

WATER: Federals distance themselves from 'The Living Murray'

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Jim Cairns remembered

COMMENT: SBS programming questioned by Vietnamese community

ASIA: Siberia - China's 'great game' to reshape Asian region

COMMENT: Don't forget the threat from North Korea

Hong Kong: next elections a test for Beijing

Books promotion page

Abortion-Breast Cancer cover-up continues

by Babette Francis

News Weekly, November 1, 2003
At the recent 60th Meeting of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) in Alabama, the cover-up of the Abortion-Breast cancer link was discussed.

Karen Malec, President of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer presented a paper: "Perversion of Science by Politics: Case Study-Informed Consent."

Malec was the author of an article published in the summer issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, "The Abortion-Breast Cancer Link: How Politics Trumped Science and Informed Consent."

The AAPS' motto, "omnia pro aegroto," means "all for the patient". The group advocates for patients' rights.

"The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the rest of the cancer establishment are making themselves irrelevant by covering up the Abortion-Breast Cancer (ABC) link," said Malec.

"They're stepping up their use of junk science for the purpose of manipulating public opinion and are severely damaging their credibility in the process. They're selectively reporting flawed studies, which misclassify thousands of post-abortive women as non-abortive.

"They're using a hypothetical problem, 'report bias,' to disparage more than two dozen studies linking abortion with breast cancer.

"We call on the cancer establishment to show the same regard for patients' rights as does the AAPS," said Malec.


Serious charges of impropriety were made against the cancer establishment in a recent Los Angeles Times commentary.

Dr Samuel S Epstein, Professor Emeritus at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, and Dr Quentin D Young, Chairman of the Health and Medicine Policy Research Group, accused the cancer establishment of suppressing evidence of environmental and occupational links to cancer, as well.

For instance, it wasn't until 1997 that the NCI informed the public about long-standing evidence of thyroid cancers from radioactive fallout resulting from atomic bomb tests in the 1950s.

These cancers could have been prevented with thyroid medication.

"The NCI is a corrupt agency," said Malec. "It wasn't until 1957 that it warned the public about the tobacco-cancer link. Even then, its warning was tepid because its political considerations are paramount."

Epstein and Young charged that the American Cancer Society (ACS) accepts contributions from manufacturers of polluting chemicals and cancer drugs.

They declared that the Society's "strong support from industry is reflected in its research choices, which are overwhelmingly aimed at treatment as opposed to prevention.

"As the Chronicle of Philanthropy, the nation's leading charity watchdog, put it in a January 1992 article," said Epstein and Young, "'The ACS is more interested in accumulating wealth than saving lives.'"

Known as "the world's wealthiest charity," the ACS pays a six-figure salary to each of its officers who head a division.

Less for more

Cancer deaths have jumped 30 percentage points and the NCI's budget ballooned from $150 million to $4.6 billion since President Nixon's "War on Cancer" began in 1971. "Paradoxically, it seems that the more we spend on cancer research, the more cancer we get," remarked Epstein and Young.

"There is sufficient evidence," argued Malec, "that cancer has become a business.

The evidence extends back to the 1960s when the American Medical Association and several top cancer research hospitals accepted grants from "Big Tobacco".

"The NCI's snow job on the ABC link is criminal," Mrs Malec maintained. "The cancer industry should be investigated."

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer is an international women's organisation founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer.

According to the former head of the Food and Drug Administration, David Kessler, the tobacco industry gave grants to researchers at Harvard, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, and others.

He added that, "In 1964 the American Medical Association (AMA) was vigorously lobbying against pending Medicare legislation while the tobacco industry was fighting efforts to place health warnings on cigarette packs.

At the same time, the six major companies offered the AMA $10 million over a five-year period to fund research on smoking and health.

On February 12, 1964, Francis Blasingame, the AMA's Executive Vice President, accepted the industry's offer.

A little more than two weeks later, Blasingame sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission, a strong advocate of warning labels.

"With respect to cigarettes," he wrote, "cautionary labelling cannot be anticipated to serve the public interest with any particular degree of success."


In Australia in February this year the Office of the Status of Women in Canberra held a conference on domestic violence sponsored in part by tobacco giant Philip Morris.

The Office of the Status of Women has given no support for the printing of the Endeavour Forum booklet on "Breast Cancer Risks and Prevention", but on the government website on women publicised by OSW the only paper on abortion is by Beryl Holmes, Queensland President of Children by Choice, an abortion promoting agency.

While the Cancer Councils in Australia claim that the abortion-breast cancer link is unproven, they are so intimidated by the feminist movement that they will not even give women information on research which they do accept.

Namely, that having more babies, having them at a younger age, and breastfeeding for longer will substantially reduce breast cancer risk.

  • Babette Francis -

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am