March 22nd 2003

  Buy Issue 2653

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The future ... after Iraq

CANBERRA OBSERVED: After Iraq: the challenge facing John Howard

MEDICINE: Leading specialists reject destructive embryo research

BIOETHICS: Embryo research and state laws

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Bazaar politics/Sponsors/Beautiful People socialism

COMMENT: The real culprits in the internet porn scandal

FAMILY: Youth legal guide alarms families

MEDIA: Accord strikes a chord / 'Australian' shake-up a matter of opinion

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Deregulation and water could be a tragedy for National Party

LETTERS: Foreign debt (letter)

LETTERS: The vision thing (letter)

How Australian support is rebuilding East Timor

WATER: Towards healthier river systems: a flawed process

NUCLEAR WEAPONS: The future of non-proliferation treaties

BOOKS: Life, Liberty and the Defence of Dignity, by Leon Kass

BOOKS: Australia And Israel: An Ambiguous Relationship, by Chanan Reich

Books promotion page

Embryo research and state laws

by Richard Egan

News Weekly, March 22, 2003
The Parliaments of South Australia, Queensland and Victoria are now considering Bills which mirror the Commonwealth's Prohibition of Human Cloning Act and Research Involving Human Embryos Act.

Premier Carr, if he wins the election, will probably follow suit despite his advocacy of cloning human embryos for research.

South Australia has followed the Commonwealth by splitting the bill to prohibit cloning from the bill to allow destructive embryo research. Queensland and Victoria have combined bills. However Premier Beattie has now agreed to demands from prolife MPs, led by Labor's Ronan Lee, for the bill to be split to allow MPs to vote for a bill to prohibit human cloning but against a bill to allow research involving human embryos. Victorian prolife MPs are expected to demand that Premier Bracks follow suit and split the Victorian bill.

The South Australian and Victorian bills overturn existing State laws prohibiting destructive research on human embryos.

Do No Harm has called for two amendments to the bills. The first would protect employees who have a conscientious objection to such research from coercion or victimisation. The second would require any therapeutic, pharmaceutical or cosmetic product produced or tested using human embryos or embryonic stem cells to be clearly labelled to indicate this so that consumers can avoid such products.

Meanwhile the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has released a public draft of its Ethical guidelines on the use of reproductive technology in clinical practice and research. Submissions are sought on the draft until March 28.

These guidelines will become regulations under the Research Involving Human Embryo Act and govern how consent may be obtained to use human embryos, and how the NHMRC Licensing Committee must determine applications for research that would harm or destroy human embryos.

  • Richard Egan

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am