March 8th 2003


  Buy Issue 2652
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

ASIA: Taiwan: opposition parties combine for next poll

BOOKS: The Aquariums Of Pyongyang: Ten Years In The North Korean Gulag

BOOKS: Charles Dickens, by Jane Smiley

BOOKS: The Great Escape, by Anton Gill

COVER STORY: Iraq: make haste slowly

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Howard shifts focus to domestic issues

AGRICULTURE: Sugar industry reports: 'social science fiction' - Ted Kolsen

FARM INCOME: Rising dollar exposes parlous state of agriculture

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Middle life crisis / Damaged goods? / The green carnations

DRUGS: Quit Marijuana an effective program in New South Wales

DRUGS - DOCUMENTATION: New cannabis studies confirm danger to users

DRUGS: 'Fifth columnist' Mike Trace resigns UN drug post

Sugar levy (letter)

Financial planning (letter)

COMMENT: Christians and Muslims in Europe: how can they co-exist?

EMPLOYMENT: Casualisation a conjuring trick

ECONOMICS: 'Efficiency' blinds policy makers' judgment

Farmers' water rights at stake

ASIA: Is reunification possible for the two Koreas?

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Sugar levy (letter)


by V. Sartori

News Weekly, March 8, 2003
Sir,

The issue of hidden taxes was raised by Taxpayers Australia director Peter McDonald in recent media reports.

While one can agree or disagree with his viewpoint on the effect these "special levies" are having on the average Australian family, I question the singling out of the dairy and sugar industries, the headlines read Hidden Taxes on Milk, Sugar cost us Millions. The headlines don't mention the Ansett levy, the Medicare levy and the Superannuation Guarantee levy. I speak only in defence of the sugar industry with which I have some experience.

The three cents a kilo levy will cost the average Australian household $1.40 a year as quoted recently by Federal Primary Industries Minister Mr Truss. If the Australian Taxpayers perceive the three cents a kilo levy on Australian consumption will change the dire situation facing farmers which is a result of bad seasons, disease and a corrupt low world price, they are wrong.

The levy will raise $120 million over five years to be used by Regional Guidance Groups in attempting to identify value adding industries for sugar (ethanol, co-generation, plastics, etc) and avenues to cost cutting, productivity gains and increased efficiencies. May I point out the latter objectives have been constantly pursued by farmers over decades.

I ask the Australian taxpayers do they agree it is right and just for a farmer to receive 18 cents from the $1.30 a kilo retail price. Incidentally a bottle of mineral water costs $1.38. Do they agree it was right and just when the tariff of $55 a tonne was removed from the domestic price in 1997? Retail price rose by 26% and the manufacturing sector profits rose fourfold while the raw sugar industry received 25% less.

Do they agree it is just that under present arrangements the raw sugar industry be paid the corrupt world price for our domestic requirements? These are just some of the facts taxpayers should consider before passing judgement on the sugar industry levy and I dare say the same would apply to our de-regulated dairy industry.

V. Sartori,
Airdmillan Via Ayr, Qld




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

MARRIAGE The issue, Bill, is transgender marriage

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE The media, champions for free speech and rights (for the media), demonstrate predictable inability to contain bias on postal vote

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Hundreds of doctors call on AMA to withdraw defective statement on same-sex marriage

EUTHANASIA What disability advocates say about assisted suicide by Daniel Giles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Triggs' one important contribution to rights by Greg Walsh

CANBERRA OBSERVED Crikey, is nobody a true dinks Aussie these days?

MORAL EDIFICATION A cartoon



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am