July 12th 2003


  Buy Issue 2661
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Will Telstra sale complete Liberals' takeover of Nationals?

EDITORIAL: The states' gambling addiction

WEST PAPUA: Rising US concern over Indonesian army killings

AGRICULTURE: Factory closure linked to stalled sugar reforms

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Counter-culture / Houses divided against themselves / Oil theories

DEFLATION: Is the world economy sailing into unchartered territory?

Partition of Kashmir? (letter)

Something rotten ... (letter)

Senate 'obstruction' (letter)

WORLD ECONOMY : The market is unpredictable

INTERVIEW: Cross-fertilisation the key to a vibrant world

SOUTH AUSTRALIA : Sex Education course leaves parents fuming

FAMILY: Tax splitting comes in from the cold

BOOKS: The West and the Rest, by Roger Scruton

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

SOUTH AUSTRALIA :
Sex Education course leaves parents fuming


by Paul Russell

News Weekly, July 12, 2003
A new sex education program developed by SHine SA (Sexual Health information network and education - formerly Family Planning SA) is being trialled in 14 South Australian schools in an initiative organised by the State Education Department.

The program's effectiveness will be evaluated by La Trobe University's Centre for Sex, Health and Society. We understand that, following the evaluation, the program will be introduced into all South Australian schools with the possibility of expanding later into other states.

Talk about teaching sex in the classroom has the potential to raise the angst of parents - that's nothing new. One of the differences with this initiative is that the Education Department and SHine SA have attempted to hide the teachers' manual from public scrutiny by stamping its cover with the injunction: "Not for distribution or citation".

Parent worries

This has been a red rag to parents and parents' groups across the state who have wondered legitimately exactly what it is that they're not supposed to see.

It was not until Family First MP, Andrew Evans, tabled the documents in the State Parliament, that the content could be scrutinised for public comment.

The program targets children from 11 to 15 years of age in the school years 8 to 10. It covers subjects under headings such as Puberty, Respecting difference, Love, Attraction and Desire, When things go wrong and Sexual health decisions.

The introduction claims that, "Relationship and sexual health education is best taught within the school curriculum by the class/health teacher", a statement that many parents refute; claiming correctly that theirs is the primary relationship for such discussions.

This underlying belief suggests that parents are not capable of instructing their own and seems to be the principle used for a "lowest common denominator" approach in the instruction and methodology employed in the manual and ancillary material. Further, the program implicitly suggests that our young people are incapable of controlling their sexual urges - chastity and "Saying No" are not suggested as an alternative course of action in any reasonable way.

Parents are also concerned about much of the content of the Teachers' Manual - to say that the program is "too much - too soon" would seem to be an understatement. In one place, students are introduced to a range of "scenario cards" and instructed to imagine themselves as the person described. Suggestions include: A young Asian man who is gay; A bisexual young man in a steady relationship with a young woman; an 'out' young lesbian who is a successful TV star, etc.

Parents want to know why their sons or daughters should be imagining themselves as these persons; especially considering that any suggestion they might imagine themselves as happily married with children is notable by its absence.

An exercise intended to, "explore ways young people can have close intimate/sexual relationships without having penetrative sex" is set out for discussion by the use of scenario cards. There are forty cards ranging in subject from "give or get a hug" to "touching or sucking breasts" and "masturbating each other".

Safe?

Under the fallacious title "Safe Practices" students are asked to arrange another set of cards into the categories: Safe, Unsafe, and Safe only if. In groups the children consider such activities as anal intercourse, oral sex and use of a sex toy for arousal. Once again, truly safe practices such as chastity and monogamy in marriage are absent.

Many would say that the descriptions above of what is in the Teachers' Manual are bad enough - yet many also consider what is absent from the program to be far worse. The lack of discussion of abstinence is one glaring omission.

The information on sexually transmitted diseases is also seriously lacking in its detail. For example, the discussion on HIV/AIDS fails to mention that AIDS leads to death. Condoms are said to prevent the spread of STDs yet the fact that some diseases may be transmitted by contact with the genital area alone is not mentioned.

This issue has been the subject of a series of meetings organised by concerned parents around the state. On each occasion, the Premier, the Education Minister, SHine and school representatives have been invited to put their side of the argument.

The invitations have been declined on every occasion. Is it any wonder that parents across the State are angry and feel betrayed when the supporters of the program are refusing to answer their questions?

  • Paul Russell




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm