January 11th 2003


  Buy Issue 2648
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Paid maternity leave: who benefits?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: 2002: when the chickens came home to roost

EVENTS: Claudio Betti to visit Australia

BIOETHICS: Embryo battle was worth the fight

STRAWS IN THE WIND: To America with love, from Osama bin Laden

LETTERS: Real world (letter)

LETTERS: Comparisons (letter)

PROFILE: Dr George Pell: Australia's leading churchman

SOUTH ASIA: India's ethnic conflicts

COMMENT: In the wake of the Cultural Revolution

BOOKS: The Life of Matthew Flinders, by Miriam Estensen

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

LETTERS:
Comparisons (letter)


by Peter Golding

News Weekly, January 11, 2003
Sir,

Twice in recent months (News Weekly, October 5 and December 14) Colin Teese has used the comparison of economic growth rates between 1960-80 and 1980-2000 to assert the failure of free market economics.

How strong is this argument? Let me start with an analogy of two groups.

At the beginning of a given year, Group A has 10 members and Group B has 50. During the course of the year Group A increases its membership from 10 to 30 and Group B from 50 to 100.

Which group has been the more successful? That depends on which way you look at the figures.

While Group B has been the more successful numerically, its 50 new members represents a 100 per cent increase. Group A has recruited only 20 new members.This, however, represents a 200 per cent increase.

The point is that growth rates expressed in percentage terms are meaningless unless we know the starting point.

The economic growth rates for the period 1960-80 may have appeared very strong because in 1960 many countries, particularly in Europe, still had not fully recovered from the Second World War and their GDP figures were poor. It is possible that the growth rates achieved from 1960-80 were off a low base and were unsustainable irrespective of which economic model was in place from 1980-2000.

Mr Teese needs to provide more detail and analysis before his argument can be regarded as watertight.

Peter Golding,
Ashwood, Vic




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm