February 8th 2003

  Buy Issue 2650

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Old-growth forests and wildfires

COMMENT: Iraq's last chance to avert war

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Howard turns eyes to NSW poll

HIGH COURT: A further improvement in the High Court

STRAWS IN THE WIND: False Dawn / Iraq another Vietnam? / UN: ideal and reality

AGRICULTURE: Deregulation and low prices see sugar investment collapse

The fatal flaw in economic rationalism (letter)

Why men avoid fatherhood (letter)

Cattle grazing to cut bushfire risk (letter)

Firefighters deserve our thanks (letter)

Canberra's tragedy (letter)

Case against Saddam not established (letter)

Full story (letter)

Cane farmers' survey (letter)

PROFILE: Solzhenitsyn: the conscience of modern society

ASIA: China launches massive infrastructure expansion

VICTORIA: Taxpayers bankroll alternative lifestyles

ASIA: Taiwan's rural finance in trouble

BOOKS: ANSETT: the Collapse, by Geoff Easdown and Peter Wilms

BOOKS: Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President's Council on Bioethics

Books promotion page

survey link


A further improvement in the High Court

by Dr Ian Spry QC

News Weekly, February 8, 2003
Every significant change in the High Court is seen in the recent replacement of Justice Mary Gaudron by Justice Dyson Heydon, of the New South Wales Court of Appeal.

Justice Gaudron was a political appointment - she was chosen not on merit (for she was by far the weakest member of the Court), but (a) because she was a woman and (b) because she had Labor Party political support.

Justice Dyson Heydon, by contrast, is a legal scholar with an international reputation, having been a noted professor at Sydney University, and an eminent member of the New South Wales Court of Appeal.

Although some lobby groups advocated Justice Gaudron's replacement by another woman, they were unable to identify any female judge or senior counsel with sufficient legal abilities and learning.

The importance of the appointment of Justice Heydon is that he is a traditional lawyer, not an activist. He will follow the salutary tradition of such judges as Sir Owen Dixon and Sir Harry Gibbs in applying the law fairly and conscientiously. He is a firm believer in the doctrine of "precedent". By this doctrine, judges apply the existing law: they do not substitute their own self-manufactured law, but leave changes in the law to the Parliament.

Coincidentally, a short time before his elevation to the High Court, Justice Heydon delivered an address entitled, "Judicial Activism and the Death of the Rule of Law".

This address contains one of the most careful and persuasive discussions of the evils of judicial activism. It criticises the Mabo case, inter alia, in which a previous, activist High Court had made up new law by creating "native title" when previously no native title existed.

The Mabo case is of particular interest in view of the extraordinary magnitude of the change that it effected. Irresponsible judges - that is, judges not responsible to an electorate or to any democratic institution - gave force to their own personal prejudices (which prejudices were deplored by many members of the community), so as to confer new rights on Aboriginals which may have an eventual value of billions of dollars.

The appointment of Justice Heydon leaves Justice Michael Kirby as the sole activist judge amongst the seven members of the Court. Justice Kirby is a homosexual activist, whose public proselytising of homosexual relationships renders him a particularly inappropriate member. It may be expected that his reputation and his influence will continue to decline.

The restoration of the standing of the High Court is a particular achievement of the Howard Government. Although that Court still falls short of the Dixon Court of fifty years ago, it is no longer to be seen as an activist institution, as in the days of such controversial justices as Sir Anthony Mason and Lionel Murphy.

This will disappoint activists of the left, but others will be well pleased.

Is it too much to hope for that if a Crean Government, or some other Labor Government, is elected, that Government will not repeat the errors of previous Labor Governments, which have a record of appointing activists who are often of poor quality?

  • Dr Ian Spry QC

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse

News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm