December 13th 2003

  Buy Issue 2672

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY : Does a new ALP leader mean a new direction?

EDITORIAL: More Australian industries to be sacrificed

HONG KONG: Pro-democracy party triumphs in HK election

DRUGS: Parliamentary Committee recommends dumping Harm Minimisation

COMMENT: Internet porn's innocent victims

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Somnambulists at the wheel / West and rest / Knopfelmacher's view

LETTERS: Who's looking after NSW's water?

LETTERS: Cane farmers feel 'alienated'

LETTERS: Prohibition never works - says who?

LETTERS: The morning-after pill in schools

LETTERS: Tariff cuts and unemployment

LETTERS: Good counsel

MEDIA: The blindness of the affluent

TRADE: US-China exchange rate battle to affect Australian exporters

WTO: International trade policy: where to next?

BOOKS: AN AUSTRALIAN IN ASIA: Cities of the Hot Zone, by Greg Sheridan

BOOKS: Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, by Simon Sebag Montefiore

BOOKS: The Fields of Coleraine, by Frank Gardiner

Books promotion page

The morning-after pill in schools

by Molly Brennan

News Weekly, December 13, 2003

"The morning after pill: coming soon to a school near you?" (News Weekly, November 1). Here, the answer is that it has already come - as long ago as last year.

In January 2002, the CEO of our Catholic Education Office decided to bring our Catholic schools into what he perceives to be the "real world".

He judged it incumbent on him "to ensure that students have the basic knowledge and skills to deal with [this] real world".

He also judged that the students should be taught these skills though they are "not congruent with current Catholic teaching" - and though they include how to deceive their parents.

Among these skills, taught by means of information sheets distributed by the Catholic Education Office to the Diocesan Catholic school are those necessary for successful contraception/abortion by means of the "morning after" pill. How to take it, how it works, how to acquire it without their parents' knowledge.

The South Devon plan does not seem much deadlier than ours for fifteen-year-old children.

I fear that, in the not too distant future, the Church will again find itself being sued, in this case by women who ascribe their sterility to their abortions from the age of fifteen, and hold their Catholic schools responsible.

Molly Brennan,
Bendigo, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am