December 13th 2003

  Buy Issue 2672

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY : Does a new ALP leader mean a new direction?

EDITORIAL: More Australian industries to be sacrificed

HONG KONG: Pro-democracy party triumphs in HK election

DRUGS: Parliamentary Committee recommends dumping Harm Minimisation

COMMENT: Internet porn's innocent victims

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Somnambulists at the wheel / West and rest / Knopfelmacher's view

LETTERS: Who's looking after NSW's water?

LETTERS: Cane farmers feel 'alienated'

LETTERS: Prohibition never works - says who?

LETTERS: The morning-after pill in schools

LETTERS: Tariff cuts and unemployment

LETTERS: Good counsel

MEDIA: The blindness of the affluent

TRADE: US-China exchange rate battle to affect Australian exporters

WTO: International trade policy: where to next?

BOOKS: AN AUSTRALIAN IN ASIA: Cities of the Hot Zone, by Greg Sheridan

BOOKS: Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, by Simon Sebag Montefiore

BOOKS: The Fields of Coleraine, by Frank Gardiner

Books promotion page

Cane farmers feel 'alienated'

by Bill Micola

News Weekly, December 13, 2003

I recently chaired a meeting of canefarmers, the Sugar Industry Reform Committee and Hon. Bob Katter MP in Ingham.

The meeting was well attended by over 350 growers and supporters from the local area.

A motion was proposed to be put to the Canegrowers' Board in Brisbane by Invicta Board Member, Max Menzel.

It said, in part, "That the Ministerial Directive be immediately removed and a guarantee be sought from the Federal Government forthwith to ensure that no NCP (National Competition Policy) penalties be enforced on the State government as a result (as requested by State Primary Industries Minister, Henry Palaszczuk) ...

"That the domestic price subsequently be raised to encompass a realistic price for domestic sugar.

"That price support to the sugar industry be in the form of a government guaranteed loan to supplement the price pool, with interest paid by Government ...

"That each sugar producing district be allocated a quota of loan monies to be paid back through QSL (Qld Sugar Ltd), once the pool price increases to $300/tonne; and

"That the loan would be progressively paid off by the amount skimmed off over that figure to leave a minimum pool price of $300/tonne".

The motion was read out and those present were asked if they wanted any discussion or clarification. None was requested.

The meeting was asked if it supported the motion being put to the Board on its behalf.

There was not one dissenting voice, the motion was supported unanimously.

At the Board Meeting in Brisbane, when the motion was put by Mr Menzel, not one other single Board member would second the motion that the growers had so strongly endorsed in Ingham.

Is it any wonder that the industry is in the position it now is?

Is it any wonder that the growers feel so alienated and betrayed by their own organisation?

It appears that the calls at the meeting for new representation on the Canegrowers' Committees and Boards won't be before time.

Bill Micola,
Ayr, Qld

Listen to
News Weekly Podcasts

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

ROYAL COMMISSION Hatchet job on Cardinal Pell breached basic principle of fairness

COVER STORY Gearing up to ditch free-trade policy

CANBERRA OBSERVED Regret over our rushed marriage to China

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Crucial to get Virgin Australia flying again

CANBERRA OBSERVED What's China's beef with our barley?

EDITORIAL Rebuilding industry won't just happen: here's what's needed

EDITORIAL Post-covid19, create a national development bank

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm