December 13th 2003


  Buy Issue 2672
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY : Does a new ALP leader mean a new direction?

EDITORIAL: More Australian industries to be sacrificed

HONG KONG: Pro-democracy party triumphs in HK election

DRUGS: Parliamentary Committee recommends dumping Harm Minimisation

COMMENT: Internet porn's innocent victims

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Somnambulists at the wheel / West and rest / Knopfelmacher's view

LETTERS: Who's looking after NSW's water?

LETTERS: Cane farmers feel 'alienated'

LETTERS: Prohibition never works - says who?

LETTERS: The morning-after pill in schools

LETTERS: Tariff cuts and unemployment

LETTERS: Good counsel

MEDIA: The blindness of the affluent

TRADE: US-China exchange rate battle to affect Australian exporters

WTO: International trade policy: where to next?

BOOKS: AN AUSTRALIAN IN ASIA: Cities of the Hot Zone, by Greg Sheridan

BOOKS: Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, by Simon Sebag Montefiore

BOOKS: The Fields of Coleraine, by Frank Gardiner

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

LETTERS:
Cane farmers feel 'alienated'


by Bill Micola

News Weekly, December 13, 2003
Sir,

I recently chaired a meeting of canefarmers, the Sugar Industry Reform Committee and Hon. Bob Katter MP in Ingham.

The meeting was well attended by over 350 growers and supporters from the local area.

A motion was proposed to be put to the Canegrowers' Board in Brisbane by Invicta Board Member, Max Menzel.

It said, in part, "That the Ministerial Directive be immediately removed and a guarantee be sought from the Federal Government forthwith to ensure that no NCP (National Competition Policy) penalties be enforced on the State government as a result (as requested by State Primary Industries Minister, Henry Palaszczuk) ...

"That the domestic price subsequently be raised to encompass a realistic price for domestic sugar.

"That price support to the sugar industry be in the form of a government guaranteed loan to supplement the price pool, with interest paid by Government ...

"That each sugar producing district be allocated a quota of loan monies to be paid back through QSL (Qld Sugar Ltd), once the pool price increases to $300/tonne; and

"That the loan would be progressively paid off by the amount skimmed off over that figure to leave a minimum pool price of $300/tonne".

The motion was read out and those present were asked if they wanted any discussion or clarification. None was requested.

The meeting was asked if it supported the motion being put to the Board on its behalf.

There was not one dissenting voice, the motion was supported unanimously.

At the Board Meeting in Brisbane, when the motion was put by Mr Menzel, not one other single Board member would second the motion that the growers had so strongly endorsed in Ingham.

Is it any wonder that the industry is in the position it now is?

Is it any wonder that the growers feel so alienated and betrayed by their own organisation?

It appears that the calls at the meeting for new representation on the Canegrowers' Committees and Boards won't be before time.

Bill Micola,
Ayr, Qld




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Euthanasia: shutting up by shouting down

ENERGY Hazelwood is vital to Australia's power supply

MULTICULTURALISM First among equals or an also-ran culture?

EUTHANASIA British actress tells it like it is

EDITORIAL Gas, power crises are due to renewables obsession by Peter Westmore

COVER STORY Decentralisation: an undeveloped country

ABORTION Law condones the act as it criminalises the image



News and views from around the world



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am