December 13th 2003

  Buy Issue 2672

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY : Does a new ALP leader mean a new direction?

EDITORIAL: More Australian industries to be sacrificed

HONG KONG: Pro-democracy party triumphs in HK election

DRUGS: Parliamentary Committee recommends dumping Harm Minimisation

COMMENT: Internet porn's innocent victims

STRAWS IN THE WIND : Somnambulists at the wheel / West and rest / Knopfelmacher's view

LETTERS: Who's looking after NSW's water?

LETTERS: Cane farmers feel 'alienated'

LETTERS: Prohibition never works - says who?

LETTERS: The morning-after pill in schools

LETTERS: Tariff cuts and unemployment

LETTERS: Good counsel

MEDIA: The blindness of the affluent

TRADE: US-China exchange rate battle to affect Australian exporters

WTO: International trade policy: where to next?

BOOKS: AN AUSTRALIAN IN ASIA: Cities of the Hot Zone, by Greg Sheridan

BOOKS: Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, by Simon Sebag Montefiore

BOOKS: The Fields of Coleraine, by Frank Gardiner

Books promotion page

Internet porn's innocent victims

by Bill Muehlenberg

News Weekly, December 13, 2003
In late November the Sexpo experience again came to the city of Melbourne. The four day exhibition is put on by the porn industry. It is primarily an assortment of strippers and porn stars and sex club owners, with a touch of "lifestyle" exhibits thrown in to make it look respectable. It first began in Melbourne in 1996 and now features in most capital cities on an annual basis.

This year former Democrats' leader Don Chipp was at the launch of the Melbourne Sexpo, waxing lyrical about the benefits of pornography. He argued that censorship of pornography leads to political censorship and then to totalitarianism.


His understanding of politics and history leave me somewhat bewildered. I didn't know that when we sent our sons overseas to fight for our freedom, we were really fighting for the right to visit peep shops and strip joints. I didn't realise that when we took on Hitler or Saddam, it was so that the porn industry could get rich while many were entrapped by the downward spiral of addiction to pornography.

This point was highlighted by a recent juxtaposition of articles on the issue of porn. Just a day before the papers were reporting on Chipp and his rousing speech on what freedom is all about, child protection experts were warning that Internet porn is creating a new generation of sexual predators as young as six. As reported in the Melbourne Age, (November 26, 2003), these experts were reporting a huge increase in children under ten sexually abusing other children. Almost all of these cases were due to kids browsing porn sites on the Internet.

The Child At Risk Assessment Unit at the Canberra Hospital said there was a "dramatic" increase of such cases, and that Internet porn was a major contributing factor. This is in line with American research which demonstrates a firm link between sexual predators and Internet porn.

Earlier this year a survey conducted by the Australia Institute found that nearly 40 per cent of teenage boys had deliberately sought out porn sites on the Web.

Yet Don Chipp seems to think that if we tighten up on this kind of material, our freedoms are in jeopardy. But one has to ask, what about the freedoms of an eight-year-old to not be sexually molested by another eight-year-old? Because adults like Chipp think it is so vital that we are all able to enjoy any and every kind of sleaze and smut, we are putting a generation of young people at risk.

And it is not just children who are being destroyed by pornography. The Age also featured another article recently, entitled "Addicted to Porn" (November 22, 2003).

Reprinted from the Guardian in Britain, the article spoke of the soul-destroying damage porn is doing to adults as well. The article was quite forthright in showing how sexual addictions are destroying men, families and relationships.

"Pornography," says the author, "is a lie. It peddles falsehoods about men, women and human relationships. In the name of titillation, it seduces vulnerable, lonely men - and a small number of women - with the promise of intimacy, and delivers only a transitory fix."

One man, addicted to porn, even in his 15 years of marriage, says "Porn is like alcoholism; it clings to you like a leech."

The author continues, "Lost in a world of pornographic fantasy, men can become less inclined, as well as increasingly less able, to form lasting relationships. In part, this is due to the underlying message of pornography. Ray Wyre, a specialist in sexual crime, says pornography 'encourages transience, experimentation and moving between partners'."

One porn user puts it this way: pornography "brings intense disappointment, precisely because it is not what I'm really searching for. It's rather like hungry people standing outside the window of a restaurant, thinking that they're going to get fed."

And porn is not a victimless crime. There is a very real dark side to pornography. There is a clear link between viewing pornography and sexual violence. While every porn user does not become a sex offender, almost all sex offenders were porn users.


Perhaps the most notorious example was US serial killer Ted Bundy. Before being executed for his crimes in 1989, he made these revealing remarks: "It happened in stages, gradually ... My experience with ... pornography that deals on a violent level with sexuality is that, once you become addicted to it, and I look at this as a kind of addiction like other kinds of addiction, I would keep looking for more potent, more explicit, more graphic kinds of material. Like an addiction, you keep craving something which is harder, harder, something which gives you a greater sense of excitement, until you reach the point where the pornography only goes so far ... It reaches that jumping-off point where you begin to wonder if, maybe, actually doing it will give you that which is beyond just reading about it or looking at it."

Of course groups like the Australian Family Association have been making these sorts of warnings about pornography for years, but it has been politically incorrect to do so. Thus it is surprising, and encouraging, to see mainstream media outlets finally begin to tackle the issue realistically and honestly.

  • Bill Muehlenberg

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am