April 19th 2003

  Buy Issue 2655

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Iraq: winning the peace

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Foreign debt binge threatens economy

Ethanol a solution to air pollution caused lung cancers

Wider focus needed on Murray Darling water controversy

ENVIRONMENT: Federal bushfire inquiry's challenge

TRADE: Safeguarding our $800m wheat contracts

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Why shouldn't everyone have the bomb? / Strategic history / North Korean blackmail

MEDIA: Journalism becomes a commodity

LETTERS: Nationals misrepresented (letter)

BOOKS: Globalization and its Discontents, by Joseph Stiglitz

EDUCATION: Iraq: the view in the classroom

DRUGS: United Nations body slams Sydney injecting room

BOOKS: The Marriage Problem: How our Culture has Weakened Families, by James Q. Wilson

BOOKS: Tolkien's Christianity: J.R.R. Tolkien's Sanctifying Myth, by Bradley J. Birzer

FILM REVIEW: Ned Kelly (2003)

Books promotion page

Wider focus needed on Murray Darling water controversy

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, April 19, 2003
Federal and State governments have very narrowly focused on removing 5-15% of farmers water allocations, in the false expectation that increased water flows will solve the environmental problems experienced in parts of the Basin.

However, environmental experts say that any serious attempt at solutions must involve a five part strategy, aside from salinity management that has already seen a substantial reduction in salt concentrations at the point where the Murray leaves Victoria and enters South Australia.

The issues that need to be simultaneously addressed are:

  • instream habitat: the logs, water plants, water turbidity and temperature that affect life in the river;
  • riparian zone health: this relates to stream bank stability, land and vegetation adjoining the river, like wet lands and billabongs, and flood effects on the regeneration of the flora and fauna;
  • instream structures: the use of locks, dams and weirs which affect river flow, irrigation use and timing of riparian zone flooding;
  • seasonality of flows: the natural regeneration cycle is in August-September (coinciding with the periodic, traditional snow melt leading to river flooding) whereas current flood timing is November-February when farmers need irrigation water; and
  • volume of water flows down the river systems in the Basin.

The only one of these five aspects being considered by Federal and State authorities is volume flow, which is arguably the least important. It may dilute the problems but won't solve the environmental issues, and is likely to throw most of the cost of the plan back onto residents of the Basin, particularly farmers.

For any strategy to work, it must address this range of environmental issues and win the confidence and support of the regional residents of the Basin. The process must involve:

  • clearly defining agreed river health issues;
  • prioritising river health issues as to the urgency of remedial action and the costs and benefits of such action;
  • agreeing on the most cost-effective method of addressing each problem, and minimising the socio-economic impacts; and
  • instituting an agreed monitoring program, involving agreed regional representatives to ascertain if the remedial measures are actually delivering results.

Currently, there is no proposal to have any scientific monitoring of increased water flows to determine how they impact on the environment!

Public perceptions about the Basin's environmental issues also need to be corrected. For example, currently, the region is gripped by drought. If it not for the dams, locks and weirs in the Basin, the river system would be dry or stagnant, inflicting an enormous toll on wild life.

As the Murray Daring Basin Commission weekly report indicated in January, "Under fully natural conditions without the dams and weirs of the Murray System, the River Murray flow would by now be extremely low or would have ceased to flow downstream of Swan Hill. In contrast the flow at Swan Hill is currently 4,300 megalitres/day and actual flow into SA is 7,000 megalitres/day." (One megalitre is the equivalent of one Olympic sized swimming pool.)

  • Pat Byrne

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am