September 21st 2002

  Buy Issue 2642

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Iraq: America's dilemma

EDITORIAL: Is there an answer to recurrent drought?

Singapore-style super scheme: interest stirs in ALP

AGRICULTURE: Cane farmers reject sugar package

Straws in the Wind: Boat opponents / The house that Don built

Indonesia: Who are the terrorists in West Papua?

COMMENT: Australia-US free trade: MAI through the back door?

Washington trade deal (letter)

Telstra sell off (letter)

Child abduction: parents beware (letter)

Community banks expand (letter)

Character in public life (letter)

REGIONAL AFFAIRS: East Timor: the challenge ahead

Media ownership and control: the next step

UNITED STATES: Greenspan hoists the white flag on economic policy

DOCUMENTATION: Can Professor Trounson's statements be trusted?

ASIA: The Philippines: no cause for optimism

BOOKS: Radical Students: The Old Left at Sydney University

Books promotion page

Can Professor Trounson's statements be trusted?

by Ron Boswell

News Weekly, September 21, 2002
National Party Senate Leader, Ron Boswell, has questioned the accuracy of statements by Professor Alan Trounson, the leading light in the campaign for legislation allowing experimentation on human embryos. As Senator Boswell's concerns have not been fully reported in the media, we publish them here as a matter of record.

During the past two weeks of debate over human embryo experiments, several assertions have been made by Alan Trounson.

Firstly, he presented the "rat video" to MPs as evidence of the benefits of human embryo stem cells. When questioned, he confirmed that they were embryo cells from lines approved by President Bush. He later admitted that they were germ cells and not the type involved in the legislation before Parliament. If these cells behave in similar ways as alleged:

1) Where is the research to prove it?
2) Why not make the case by using research directly related to the cells before Parliament?
3) If embryo cells weren't used in the "rat video", then why do we need to use them?

Secondly, Mr Trounson provided a written reference for research to back up the "rat video". The reference is to an article published by Nature Medicine-Online in August 2002. The article has never been published. To provide a false written reference for it is very wrong. Again, the claims were made for "human ES cells" when they were in fact germ cells from a two-month foetus, not a five-day embryo as envisaged in the legislation.

In addition, the research was stated to show that it would help with Motor Neurone Disease. This is also incorrect. Motor Neurone Disease refers to something completely different from what was studied in the unpublished research.

Thirdly, Mr Trounson told the Coalition Party room briefing, and repeated his statement to me personally, that he had divested himself of all shareholdings related to embryo research because he wanted it understood that he was in it for the science only.

A search of the Singapore registered company, ES Cell International, reveals Mr Trounson still has 200,000 shares. His close associate, Associate Professor Martin Pera, also has 200,000 shares. Mr Trounson gave me a private undertaking and the party room a public undertaking, that he had no more shares in such companies.

The explanation reported in The Australian yesterday was that there were complications slowing the divestment process. That is not good enough. If you say black is black, you can't come along later and say black is white. Mr Trounson's partner also has shares in ES Cell Australia which has 4,667,000 preference shares in ES Cell International.

ES Cell International is a key commercial partner of the Centre for Stem Cells and Tissue Repair, which won $46.5 million Commonwealth funding on 30th May this year for its Biotechnology Centre of Excellence proposal. It also received $11.07 million from the Victorian Government consortium.

A core scientific participant of the Centre for Excellence is the National Centre for Advanced Cell Engineering, also headed by Alan Trounson. This centre received $5.5 million of Commonwealth funding for a building and equipment for work on human embryonic stem cells.

An official in the Department of Education, Science and Training told a Senate Estimates Committee on 21st February this year that the majority shareholding in ES Cell International is Australian. Yet, figures from her department provided in answer to a question on notice reveal that Australian shareholding is less than 50%.

Therefore, the key commercial partner of two related Australian research centres that have received upwards of $63 million of government-linked funds (state and federal), is a foreign majority owned company in which Mr Trounson still holds a significant shareholding. Monash University owns 1.2 million shares in ES Cell International.

There are many questions to be raised in the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee that is looking at the embryo research bill. Already it has been confirmed that once embryo products leave our shores, the legislation as it stands cannot prevent practices outlawed in Australia, such as therapeutic cloning (as allowed in Singapore).

Monash University must explain whether it intends to be party to experiments outlawed in Australia, and as a minority shareholder, how it will prevent such experiments from being carried out overseas by its international partners,

Many questions still exist as to how the foreign majority owned commercial partners will benefit from research funded by Australian taxpayers. These will be pursued with vigour in the Senate Committee process.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am