October 5th 2002

  Buy Issue 2643

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Hurdles to the sell-off of Telstra

Queensland sugar protests grow

Turnbull contradicts Costello's new agenda

GERMANY: Floods, Iraq help Schroeder scrape back

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Goodbye to all that? Surely!

ECONOMICS: Globalisation: where is it going?

MEDIA: September 11: media's 'greed for tears' writ large

LETTERS: Vietnam commitment right (letter)

LETTERS: On our own terms (letter)

LETTERS: Democrats' suicide (letter)

LETTERS: Singapore (letter)

HISTORY: When we dead awaken

OBITUARY: Heroic Vietnamese cardinal Van Thuan dies in Rome

BOOKS:Demon of the Waters, by Gregory Gibson

Books promotion page

September 11: media's 'greed for tears' writ large

by Michael Scammell

News Weekly, October 5, 2002
So which September 11 moment sticks in your head? When the plane slices into the first World Trade Centre Tower? Or the strike on the second tower? Or when the whole thing falls over like a pack of cards and that cloud of smoke starts to float through the streets of New York?

No matter what your most compelling memory of September 11, you have no doubt seen it ad nauseum last month.

For the television networks, September 11 was nothing if not a battle for exclusives. Channel 7 was first, claiming it had the all-important exclusive of the week - the French-made documentary 9/11 with footage never before seen.


Not be left out, Channel 10 conjured up their own - a Sandra Sully hosted exclusive documentary focusing on the New York fire fighters which they ran a week before the September 11 anniversary, no doubt to scoop the programming on the other networks.

And Channel 9, sticking to their usual adage that "more is better" (even without Eddie McGuire) ran an all-night special on the day of the 11th itself.

Given the popularity of television "football marathons" at this time of year, perhaps this new fashion in Grief Marathons is the way to go in the battle for ratings.

And if you can't beat your rival networks to the exclusive footage, you can at least reinvent the tragedy as a backdrop to showcase your news and current affairs stars.

Thus Sandra, Naomi, Kerry and Mike made their way across the Pacific to the empty paddock of Ground Zero and set up shop with the rest of the world's media in an attempt to have some of the gravitas of the occasion rub off on them.

Influential American journal New Republic has described this linking of high profile media commentators to major international events as creating "tourists in history".

All those journalists on location on September 11 interviewing each other and asking that all-important and perennial journalist-to-journalist question: "Where were you when the first plane hit?" - it's kind of scary to contemplate.

None of the above is meant to treat glibly the events of September 11; rather it is an attempt to get inside the heads of those in the media who generated this glut of coverage.


The truth is we live in an age that likes to think it looks to the future but in fact - courtesy of an electronic media with an insatiable need for copy - returns constantly to the past and repackages and replays it over and over again.

A tragedy on the massive proportions of September 11 feeds to what has been described (again, the New Republic) as the media's "greed for tears".

Nothing was more real for the media than what happened "live-to-air" that day in New York City - the smoke from the first crash was witnessed and described first-hand by a New York breakfast television program - but of course once that moment's passed, television has to fill the next moment... and the next. So it goes on.


No doubt the media can keep the momentum of September 11 going for a while yet - and then of course there are the 10th and 20th anniversary specials to come.

Keen media followers will recognise the process - haven't we seen it all before with the death of Princess Diana, and the whole media industry created around the tragic Mills and Boon story that was her life?

But perhaps none of this should surprise us. Bin Laden and the terrorists that piloted the planes on September 11 knew a thing or two about the media.

They carefully chose the attack sites and the time of day to create an event that television would find impossible to avert its eyes from.

Given the enormous media coverage planned over the next week, one would have to say that at least on that score the terrorists succeeded in their plans.

Of course quieter commemorations to the victims of September 11 without the media hoopla did occur - church services were held around Australia.

They were moving events. And if you were unable to attend, no doubt you caught the footage later - tears and all - on the television news that night.

  • Michael Scammell is a former Media Officer for the US Consulate in Melbourne. - michaelscammell@hotmail.com

Listen to
News Weekly Podcasts

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

ROYAL COMMISSION Hatchet job on Cardinal Pell breached basic principle of fairness

COVER STORY Gearing up to ditch free-trade policy

CANBERRA OBSERVED Regret over our rushed marriage to China

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Crucial to get Virgin Australia flying again

CANBERRA OBSERVED What's China's beef with our barley?

EDITORIAL Rebuilding industry won't just happen: here's what's needed

EDITORIAL Post-covid19, create a national development bank

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm