November 2nd 2002

  Buy Issue 2645

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Bali: after the dust settles ...

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Vultures circle Crean after Cunningham debacle

NEW ZEALAND: US links free trade to repeal of NZ nuclear ships ban

NEW ZEALAND: Kiwibank on target for 100,000 customers

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Global systems / The splitting of the West / After the earthquake

WESTERN AUSTRALIA: 'Unlawful' electoral changes: McGinty tries again

AGRICULTURE: Farmers' overwhelming support for alternate sugar package

LETTERS: Bush doctrine (letter)

LETTERS: Accepting responsibility (letter)

LETTERS: Drinking age (letter)

ECONOMICS: Getting to work on the world economy

COMMENT: Holding on to the centre

COMMENT: Monash shootings and the irresponsibility culture

COMMENT: Affirmative action illuminated

EUROPE: New members, new problems for European Union

ASIA: Behind Pakistan's Islamist revival

BOOKS: Marriage: Just a piece of paper?

Books promotion page

Bush doctrine (letter)

by John Barich

News Weekly, November 2, 2002

You are to be congratulated for drawing attention to the USA's most important new strategic doctrine (News Weekly, October 19, 2002).

In the aftermath of the Bali massacre, Chapter III of "the National Security Strategy of the USA " is all important to Australia and the other allies of the US. It calls for collaborative work against all acts of terrorism so that "terrorism will be viewed in the same light as slavery, piracy or genocide".

The document links terrorism with the possible use of weapons of mass destruction and therefore justifies the simultaneous attack on Iraq and the terrorist groups. It is wrong for some of our commentators to prefer dealing with terrorism instead of Iraq.

In any case, to antagonise the US is not in Australia's long term interest because we will never be able to do without the protection afforded by the ANZUS Treaty.

Your editorial rightly draws attention to a softening towards China. However, as Muslim fundamentalism is the more immediate threat, China may be considered by the US as a short term collaborator; and because of trading interests, the US also would not wish to antagonise an authoritarian China. In any case the document twice mentions the need to safeguard Taiwan.

Another pleasing feature of the doctrine is the USA's continued opposition to the International Criminal Court and the continued zero tolerance to the entry of drugs into the Western World.

The document should be required reading for all Australians concerned about the national interest.

John Barich,
Claremont, WA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am