May 18th 2002

  Buy Issue 2633

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: U.S. Farm Bill ends free trade illusion

EDITORIAL: Paid maternity leave: who benefits?

Languishing Labor fills its quota

East Timor becomes independent on May 20

Straws in the Wind: Le System / Apocrypha: Dave's lost column / Ides of March / Sin

LAW: US repudiates International Criminal Court

MEDIA: Jonestown

Refugee response (letter)

Middle East (letter)

Swift solution (letter)

Neighbourly aid (letter)

Quarantine: NZ suspends California grape imports

HEALTH: The politics of AIDS in South Africa

OPINION: Media diversity: should the market decide?

TRADE: Oxfam report shows rigged rules of world trade

ASIA: Taiwan comes in from the cold

Books promotion page

Refugee response (letter)

by Dr Michael Barr

News Weekly, May 18, 2002


I am amazed at Dr I.C.F. Spry's response to my letter on refugees (NW, 4 May). Far from defending News Weekly's stance, as the headline suggests, he has merely repeated the offence about which I was complaining. Truth be told, Dr Spry cannot have defended News Weekly's stance on refugees, because it does not have a clear position.

The half-defence of the Government offered by News Weekly, and now Dr Spry, are - to be quite frank - baffling, since their policy purpose is completely unclear. Under the guise of reporting on the Senate Inquiry, they have attacked asylum seekers as a group, showing, quite correctly, that some of them have acted indecently in their desperation.

This is hardly a surprising revelation, and the Government might even think of using it as a defence of its own actions towards asylum seekers.

Yet I worry when I see stereotyping being used as a ladle to cast mud over all asylum seekers - including those who have been granted asylum and now face resettlement in Australia as refugees.

Are they defending the Government's lies about "children overboard"? Are they saying Australia should push refugee boats (with children aboard) out to sea? Shoot across their bows? Should we incarcerate asylum seekers (including children) in detention camps? Or pack them off to Nauru?

This, of course, was the point of my original letter. It was a challenge to News Weekly to articulate a cohesive position on refugees.

I believe that News Weekly is capable of articulating an intelligent and defensible policy position, with which I might or might not agree. Given News Weekly's proud history defending the rights of refugees I still retain a fond hope that I might find myself in at least substantial agreement with the end result.

Dr Michael Barr
Nundah, Qld

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am