March 9th 2002


  Buy Issue 2628
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

The Hollingworth Affair

Federal Cabinet decision on cloning

Media putsch overwhelms Governor-General

Will CHOGM bite the bullet, oust Mugabe?

Straws in the Wind: Rumpole arising

Environment: National parks are an unacceptable fire risk

Agriculture: Bar lowered on quarantine once again

Media: Crude but effective

Environmental optimism (letter)

Bias: in the eye of the beholder (letter)

Economics: Privatisation: the promise and the reality

Comment: Trust: a commodity in short supply

Culture: How the media exploits the US$150 billion American youth market

ASIA: WTO entry will put pressure on China-Taiwan ties

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Environmental optimism (letter)


by Suryan Chandrasegaran

News Weekly, March 9, 2002

Sir,

I find it ironic that Dr Peter Carter (Letters, February 9) chose Singapore as a country whose population policies we should follow. He might be thinking of Singapore's "two is enough" population control policy which started in the 1970s.

This policy was so successful that the Singaporean Government found that birth rates dropped and the elderly proportion of the population increased. The Government started to ask: Who would support all these elderly pensioners? Who would work and pay taxes? Who would defend the island nation from invasion? The Government is now trying to encourage Singaporeans to have more children and not just stop at two.

While Singapore is a small island nation with limited natural resources, Australia has lots of unsettled arable land and natural resources.

In fact, it could be argued that we are not making effective use of these resources. Professor Lance Endersbee points out that in northern Australia monsoonal rains cause widespread flooding, but most of this water simply flows out to sea and is wasted. His proposal to use reservoirs to capture part of these flood waters for irrigation is a commendable one.

As a nation (to quote our national anthem) we still have "boundless plains to share". The doomsayers of the 1960s were wrong when they claimed all petrol in the world would be exhausted by the mid 1990s.

Today's doomsayers take a similar pessimistic attitude. They lack any faith in human ingenuity or divine providence to solve long-term problems (or perceived problems).

Their vision of the future is so pessimistic that they want to try to put up a "Full up" sign around Australia and discourage children for fear they may "break" the doomsayers' paradise.

The Singaporean example shows that such a narrow-minded approach to population will produce a much more immediate social calamity.

The population issue is essentially a battle between those adopting a selfish 'dog in the manger' approach and those who see Australia as underdeveloped and underpopulated and choose to welcome new Australians with hope rather than hostility and pessimism.

Suryan Chandrasegaran,
Leongatha, Vic




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE For bullying, look left, look left, and then look left again

COVER STORY Labor's vision for a transgender world

DOCUMENTARY Harvested Alive: killing Falung Gong in China

EDITORIAL Liddell closure: acid test for Turnbull

EUTHANASIA We risk turning our doctors into death dealers

COVER STORY Green energy push has left us blowin' in the wind

CANBERRA OBSERVED Assurances on religious freedom needed now



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am